(Dis) integrated valuation – Assessing the information gaps in ecosystem service appraisals for governance support

作者: D.N. Barton , E. Kelemen , J. Dick , B. Martin-Lopez , E. Gómez-Baggethun

DOI: 10.1016/J.ECOSER.2017.10.021

关键词: Environmental economicsEconomic valuationEcosystem servicesInformation costsComputer scienceCorporate governanceDecision contextValuation (finance)Information gap

摘要: The operational challenges of integrated ecosystem service (ES) appraisals are determined by study purpose, system complexity and uncertainty, decision-makers’ requirements for reliability accuracy methods, approaches to stakeholder–science interaction in different decision contexts. To explore these factors we defined an information gap hypothesis, based on a theory cumulative uncertainty ES appraisals. When context increase, the expected appraisal methods also increases, likelihood being used is drop, creating potential governance. In order test this evaluate 26 case studies 80 services large EU research project. We find some support decreasing coinciding with increasing decision-support context, uncertainty. do not that costs explanation gap, but rather project interacted mostly stakeholders outside most decision-relevant paper discusses how alternative definitions valuation can lead interpretations information, governance dealing

参考文章(39)
Morten W Fagerland, Leiv Sandvik, Petter Mowinckel, Parametric methods outperformed non-parametric methods in comparisons of discrete numerical variables BMC Medical Research Methodology. ,vol. 11, pp. 44- 44 ,(2011) , 10.1186/1471-2288-11-44
Dieter Rasch, Friedrich Teuscher, Volker Guiard, How robust are tests for two independent samples? Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference. ,vol. 137, pp. 2706- 2720 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.JSPI.2006.04.011
Susan Harrell Yee, John F. Carriger, Patricia Bradley, William S. Fisher, Brian Dyson, Developing scientific information to support decisions for sustainable coral reef ecosystem services Ecological Economics. ,vol. 115, pp. 39- 50 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2014.02.016
Matthias Schröter, David N. Barton, Roy P. Remme, Lars Hein, Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services: A conceptual model and a case study for Telemark, Norway Ecological Indicators. ,vol. 36, pp. 539- 551 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2013.09.018
Arild Vatn, An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal Ecological Economics. ,vol. 68, pp. 2207- 2215 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2009.04.005
Berta Martín-López, Erik Gómez-Baggethun, Marina García-Llorente, Carlos Montes, Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment Ecological Indicators. ,vol. 37, pp. 220- 228 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2013.03.003
Corentin Michel Fontaine, Nicolas Dendoncker, Rik De Vreese, Ingrid Jacquemin, Allyson Marek, Ann Van Herzele, Guénaël Devillet, Dieter Mortelmans, Louis François, Towards participatory integrated valuation and modelling of ecosystem services under land-use change Journal of Land Use Science. ,vol. 9, pp. 278- 303 ,(2014) , 10.1080/1747423X.2013.786150
Maria Jose Martinez-Harms, Brett A. Bryan, Patricia Balvanera, Elizabeth A. Law, Jonathan R. Rhodes, Hugh P. Possingham, Kerrie A. Wilson, Making decisions for managing ecosystem services Biological Conservation. ,vol. 184, pp. 229- 238 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2015.01.024
Yann Laurans, Laurent Mermet, Ecosystem services economic valuation, decision-support system or advocacy? Ecosystem services. ,vol. 7, pp. 98- 105 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.ECOSER.2013.10.002