A Conceptual Framework for Characterizing Forest Areas with High Societal Values: Experiences from the Pacific Northwest of USA and Central Europe

作者: Tina Simončič , Thomas A. Spies , Robert L. Deal , Andrej Bončina

DOI: 10.1007/S00267-015-0482-4

关键词: Conceptual frameworkEnvironmental resource managementForest managementNatural hazardRiparian zoneGeographyContext (language use)Ecosystem servicesManagement by objectivesSpatial contextual awareness

摘要: In recent decades, much work has been invested to describe forest allocations with high societal values. Yet, few comparative analyses have conducted on their importance and differences across the regions of globe. This paper introduces a conceptual framework characterize priority areas defined as identified higher values in context multi-objective management. The six dimensions (designation objective, prioritization objectives, governance, permanency, spatial scale, management regime) general approach (integrative vs. segregative) explain form role for providing services. was applied two case study regions—Pacific Northwest USA (PNW) Central Europe (CE). Differences between exist all dimensions. Late-successional riparian reserves are specific PNW, while protection against natural hazards is CE. mainly focused public lands whereas CE they include private lands. Priority PNW designated larger longer time commitments. CE, integration objectives prevails, tend be single objectives. greater tolerance timber within compared allowed. Convergent trends application indicate mixing segregation approaches

参考文章(95)
Rachel Kaplan, Stephen Kaplan, Anne R. Kearney, Gordon Bradley, Stakeholder perspectives on appropriate forest management in the Pacific Northwest Forest Science. ,vol. 45, pp. 62- 73 ,(1999) , 10.1093/FORESTSCIENCE/45.1.62
C. R. Nitschke, J. L. Innes, The application of forest zoning as an alternative to multiple-use forestry. Forestry and environmental change: socioeconomic and political dimensions. Report No.5 of the IUFRO Task Force on environmental change. ,vol. 11, pp. 97- 124 ,(2005) , 10.1079/9780851990026.0097
Jeffrey D. Kline, Marisa J. Mazzotta, Thomas A. Spies, Mark E. Harmon, Applying the Ecosystem Services Concept to Public Land Management Agricultural and Resource Economics Review. ,vol. 42, pp. 139- 158 ,(2013) , 10.1017/S1068280500007668
Compatible forest management. Compatible forest management.. ,(2003) , 10.1007/978-94-017-0309-3
E. Kapylova, H. Korn, V. Teplyakov, J. A. Sayer, J. Sayer, P. Angelstam, J. Törnblom, S. Maginnis, M. Lazdinis, Changing forest values in Europe. Earthscan. ,(2005)
R. W. Behan, Multiresource forest management: a paradigmatic challenge to professional forestry. Journal of Forestry. ,vol. 88, pp. 12- 18 ,(1990)
Simon Bell, European Forest Recreation and Tourism Taylor & Francis. ,(2008) , 10.4324/9780203872079
Charles F. Wilkinson, H. Michael Anderson, Land and Resource Planning in the National Forests ,(1987)
K. Vandekerhove, D. Little, J. Parviainen, G. Frank, A. Schuck, J. Latham, COST Action E27. Protected Forest Areas in Europe - analysis and harmonisation (PROFOR): results, conclusions and recommendations. COST Action E27. Protected Forest Areas in Europe - analysis and harmonisation (PROFOR): results, conclusions and recommendations.. ,(2007)
Sally L. Duncan, Thomas A. Spies, Old growth in a new World : a pacific northwest icon reexamined Island Press. ,(2009)