作者: Birge Wolf , Thomas Lindenthal , Manfred Szerencsits , J. Britt Holbrook , Jürgen Heß
DOI: 10.14512/GAIA.22.2.9
关键词: Research evaluation 、 Societal impact of nanotechnology 、 Usability 、 Transdisciplinarity 、 Documentation 、 USable 、 Data collection 、 Political science 、 Environmental resource management 、 Engineering ethics 、 Sustainability
摘要: Currently, established research evaluation focuses on scientific impact – that is, the of science itself. We discuss extending to cover productive interactions and practice society. The results are based interviews with scientists from (organic) agriculture a review literature broader/social/societal assessment interdisciplinary ransdisciplinary research. There is broad agreement about what activities impacts relevant for such an evaluation. However, extension hampered by lack easily usable data. To reduce effort involved in data collection,the usability existing documentation procedures (e. g., proposals reports funding) needs be increased.We propose structured database scientists, projects, programmes institutions, one will require little additional beyond reporting requirements.