Long-term reproductive outcome after hysteroscopic proximal tubal cannulation--an outcome analysis.

作者: Jacqueline P.W. Chung , Christopher J. Haines , Grace W.S. Kong

DOI: 10.1111/J.1479-828X.2012.01479.X

关键词: SurgeryInfertilityRetrospective cohort studyPregnancyMedicinePregnancy outcomesPregnancy rateComplicationOutcome analysis

摘要: Background: The optimal therapeutic method for proximal tubal obstruction (PTO) has yet to be defined. In addition,the reported successful recanalisation rate and reproductive outcome from hysteroscopic cannulation havebeen inconsistent.Aims: To examine the morbidity efficacy of laparoscopic–hysteroscopic treating PTO.Material Methods: This was a retrospective study evaluating 70 infertile women with PTO who underwentlaparoscopic–hysteroscopic in Prince Wales Hospital, university-affiliated hospital,from January 2005 December 2010. Demographical data operative details were reviewed. Women thencontacted by phone completed structured questionnaire. Recanalisation rate, intra-operative complication,pregnancy rates pregnancy outcomes examined.Results: Fifty had on at least one side tube, providing an overallsuccessful 71.4% per woman 67.0% tube. overall after successfulhysteroscopic tube is 55%. mean time become pregnant naturalconception or via clomiphene induction unilateral bilateral was10.5 ± 8.9 months. procedure associated minimal morbidity. No prognostic factors significantlyassociated rate.Conclusion: Laparoscopic–hysteroscopic morbidityand reasonable rate. It should considered as alternative vitro fertilisation.Key words: cannulation, laparoscopic chromopertubation, obstruction,reproductive outcome, infertility.

参考文章(21)
Jeffrey L. Deaton, Mark Gibson, Daniel H. Riddick, John R. Brumsted, Diagnosis treatment of cornual obstruction using a flexible tip guidewire Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 53, pp. 232- 236 ,(1990) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)53272-5
Kamalini Das, Theodore C. Nagel, John W. Malo, Hysteroscopic cannulation for proximal tubal obstruction : a change for the better ? Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 63, pp. 1009- 1015 ,(1995) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57539-6
Roseann Maikis, Ted L. Anderson, James F. Daniell, Hysteroscopic tubal cannulation: long‐term results Gynaecological Endoscopy. ,vol. 9, pp. 397- 400 ,(2000) , 10.1046/J.1365-2508.2000.00376.X
R. Woolcott, Proximal tubal occlusion: a practical approach. Human Reproduction. ,vol. 11, pp. 1831- 1833 ,(1996) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.HUMREP.A019499
Sangeeta Das, Luciano G Nardo, Mourad W Seif, Proximal tubal disease: the place for tubal cannulation. Reproductive Biomedicine Online. ,vol. 15, pp. 383- 388 ,(2007) , 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60362-8
Keiko Mekaru, Chiaki Yagi, Kozue Asato, Hitoshi Masamoto, Kaoru Sakumoto, Yoichi Aoki, Hysteroscopic tubal catheterization under laparoscopy for proximal tubal obstruction Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. ,vol. 284, pp. 1573- 1576 ,(2011) , 10.1007/S00404-011-2007-6
Mark X. Ransom, Alfredo J. Garcia, Surgical management of cornual-isthmic tubal obstruction☆ Fertility and Sterility. ,vol. 68, pp. 887- 891 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00366-X
Ben WJ Mol, John A Collins, Elizabeth A Burrows, Fulco Van Der Veen, Patrick MM Bossuyt, None, Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcome Human Reproduction. ,vol. 14, pp. 1237- 1242 ,(1999) , 10.1093/HUMREP/14.5.1237
J.F. Kerin, New methods for transcervical cannulation of the Fallopian tube International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. ,vol. 51, pp. S29- S39 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0020-7292(95)90367-4