Structuring Climate Adaptation through Multiple Perspectives: Framework and Case Study on Flood Risk Management

作者: Mohanasundar Radhakrishnan , Assela Pathirana , Richard Ashley , Chris Zevenbergen

DOI: 10.3390/W9020129

关键词: Management scienceFlood risk managementFlood mythVisionProcess managementMaladaptationClimate changeStructuringComputer scienceFraming (social sciences)Local adaptation

摘要: Adaptation to climate change is being addressed in many domains. This means that there are multiple perspectives on adaptation; often with differing visions resulting disconnected responses and outcomes. Combining singular into coherent, combined include needs can help deepen the understanding of various aspects adaptation provide more effective responses. Such combinations increase range variety measures available for implementation or avoid maladaptation compared adaptations derived from a perspective. The objective this paper present demonstrate framework structuring local using inputs perspectives. response framing has been done by: (i) contextualizing needs; (ii) analyzing drivers change; (iii) characterizing (iv) establishing links between particular emphasis taking account was demonstrated reference management flood risks case study Can Tho, Vietnam. results show enhance measures, thereby helping bring about flexible practices.

参考文章(64)
J.M. Kind, Economically efficient flood protection standards for the Netherlands Journal of Flood Risk Management. ,vol. 7, pp. 103- 117 ,(2014) , 10.1111/JFR3.12026
Michelle Woodward, Zoran Kapelan, Ben Gouldby, Adaptive Flood Risk Management Under Climate Change Uncertainty Using Real Options and Optimization Risk Analysis. ,vol. 34, pp. 75- 92 ,(2014) , 10.1111/RISA.12088
Siri H. Eriksen, Andrea J. Nightingale, Hallie Eakin, Reframing adaptation: The political nature of climate change adaptation Global Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions. ,vol. 35, pp. 523- 533 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2015.09.014
Joseph R. Kasprzyk, Patrick M. Reed, David M. Hadka, Battling Arrow’s Paradox to Discover Robust Water Management Alternatives Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. ,vol. 142, pp. 04015053- ,(2016) , 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000572
Art Dewulf, Contrasting frames in policy debates on climate change adaptation Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. ,vol. 4, pp. 321- 330 ,(2013) , 10.1002/WCC.227
R.M. Ashley, J. Blanskby, R. Newman, B. Gersonius, A. Poole, G. Lindley, S. Smith, S. Ogden, R. Nowell, Learning and Action Alliances to build capacity for flood resilience: Learning and Action Alliances Journal of Flood Risk Management. ,vol. 5, pp. 14- 22 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1753-318X.2011.01108.X
Paul Sayers, Gerry Galloway, Edmund Penning-Rowsell, Li Yuanyuan, Shen Fuxin, Chen Yiwei, Wen Kang, Tom Le Quesne, Lei Wang, Yuhui Guan, Strategic flood management: ten ‘golden rules’ to guide a sound approach International Journal of River Basin Management. ,vol. 13, pp. 137- 151 ,(2015) , 10.1080/15715124.2014.902378
Richard Newman, Richard Ashley, Susan Molyneux-Hodgson, Adrian Cashman, Managing water as a socio-technical system: the shift from ‘experts’ to ‘alliances’ Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability. ,vol. 164, pp. 95- 102 ,(2011) , 10.1680/ENSU.1000032
Tyler Felgenhauer, Mort Webster, Multiple adaptation types with mitigation: A framework for policy analysis Global Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions. ,vol. 23, pp. 1556- 1565 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2013.09.018