Shearing during late pregnancy increases size at birth but does not alter placental endocrine responses in sheep

作者: C.A. Rosales Nieto , A. Mantey , B. Makela , T. Byrem , R. Ehrhardt

DOI: 10.1017/S1751731119002696

关键词: Internal medicineEndocrinologyPregnancyGestationLate pregnancyDomestic sheep reproductionBirth weightMedicineBody mass indexNEFAEndocrine system

摘要: Shearing during the latter half of pregnancy is a common practice to improve flock health and productivity. Previous studies have demonstrated that shearing pregnant ewes at mid or late associated with an increase in lamb birth weight. In present study, we used singleton Polypay × Dorset sheep, investigate potential roles placental function changes maternal metabolism underlying this increased weight response. Two groups were randomly established blocked enrollment by animal BW, body condition score subcutaneous adipose tissue depth. The shorn (SH; n = 18) not (C; 20) gestational day (GD) 107 ± 1 (mean SEM). Weekly plasma samples collected between birth, but only six assayed for progesterone, pregnancy-associated glycoproteins (PAG1), glucose non-esterified fatty acids (NEFAs). At sex, weight, newborn mass index (BMI) recorded. Maternal BW mid- late-pregnancy was similar groups. resulted BMI (P < 0.05) regardless fetal sex did affect concentration PAG1 progesterone from GDs 100 142. After (GD100) up lambing, females had higher circulating concentrations 0.05), NEFA, compared control group. PAG1, NEFA across differ according sex. Across pregnancy, positively 0.001), concentrations. conclusion, both sexes upon pregnancies. Despite being alter endocrine Whether other factors are altered may influence remain be investigated.

参考文章(30)
S.T. Morris, S.N. McCutcheon, D.K. Revell, Birth weight responses to shearing ewes in early to mid gestation. Animal Science. ,vol. 70, pp. 363- 369 ,(2000) , 10.1017/S1357729800054825
P. R. Kenyon, S. T. Morris, D. K. Revell, S. N. McCutcheon, Maternal constraint and the birthweight response to mid-pregnancy shearing Crop & Pasture Science. ,vol. 53, pp. 511- 517 ,(2002) , 10.1071/AR01130
Julie A. Petterson, Ramona Slepetis, Richard A. Ehrhardt, Frank R. Dunshea, Alan W. Bell, Pregnancy but not moderate undernutrition attenuates insulin suppression of fat mobilization in sheep. Journal of Nutrition. ,vol. 124, pp. 2431- 2436 ,(1994) , 10.1093/JN/124.12.2431
Chiyo Matsubara, Yuji Nishikawa, Yasushi Yoshida, Kiyoko Takamura, A spectrophotometric method for the determination of free fatty acid in serum using acyl-coenzyme A synthetase and acyl-coenzyme A oxidase Analytical Biochemistry. ,vol. 130, pp. 128- 133 ,(1983) , 10.1016/0003-2697(83)90659-0
D. O. Kleemann, S. K. Walker, R. F. Seamark, Enhanced fetal growth in sheep administered progesterone during the first three days of pregnancy Reproduction. ,vol. 102, pp. 411- 417 ,(1994) , 10.1530/JRF.0.1020411
M.J. Ranilla, J. Sulon, M.D. Carro, A.R. Mantecón, J.F. Beckers, Plasmatic profiles of pregnancy-associated glycoprotein and progesterone levels during gestation in Churra and Merino sheep Theriogenology. ,vol. 42, pp. 537- 545 ,(1994) , 10.1016/0093-691X(94)90691-B
L. Sphor, G. Banchero, G. Correa, M.T.M. Osório, G. Quintans, Early prepartum shearing increases milk production of wool sheep and the weight of the lambs at birth and weaning Small Ruminant Research. ,vol. 99, pp. 44- 47 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.SMALLRUMRES.2011.03.007
D S Gardner, P J Buttery, Z Daniel, M E Symonds, Factors affecting birth weight in sheep: maternal environment. Reproduction. ,vol. 133, pp. 297- 307 ,(2007) , 10.1530/REP-06-0042
W.J. Parker, S. T. Morris, S.N. McCutcheon, Wool production and feed intake in unmated and mated Border Leicester × Romney crossbred ewes shorn in July or November New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. ,vol. 34, pp. 427- 437 ,(1991) , 10.1080/00288233.1991.10417687
P. R. Kenyon, R. G. Sherlock, S. T. Morris, P. C. H. Morel, The effect of mid- and late-pregnancy shearing of hoggets on lamb birthweight, weaning weight, survival rate, and wool follicle and fibre characteristics Crop & Pasture Science. ,vol. 57, pp. 877- 882 ,(2006) , 10.1071/AR05336