作者: Mark Tadajewski
DOI: 10.1108/17557501211224485
关键词: Sociology 、 Comparative historical research 、 Literary theory 、 Public relations 、 Marketing theory 、 Marketing mix 、 Scholarship 、 Media studies 、 Marketing science 、 Aside
摘要: Purpose – This paper aims to use Brown and Hackley's contribution the Journal of Historical Research in Marketing as a springboard for further discussion. It seeks argue that we can put aside their suggestion they intend “stress test contention Cowell is Barnum reborn”. not what are trying do at all. Their point more elemental. They aim provoke readers think critically about production marketing histories thought.Design/methodology/approach adopts viewpoint approach.Findings Given Hackley arguably encourage response work this means have been successful efforts. secured scholarship an academic marketplace where many papers go unread, never cited whose only worldly “impact” terms carbon footprint leave. said, takes seriously, engages with ...