Gemcitabine in Brief versus Prolonged Low-Dose Infusion, both Combined with Cisplatin, for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Clinical Trial

作者: Matjaz Zwitter , Viljem Kovac , Uros Smrdel , Martina Vrankar , Vesna Zadnik

DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0B013E3181AE280F

关键词: GemcitabineGastroenterologyNauseaNeutropeniaLung cancerStandard treatmentSurgerySquamous carcinomaInternal medicineChemotherapyCarcinomaMedicine

摘要: Objective Gemcitabine in low dose prolonged infusion is a treatment with documented activity against variety of tumors. We here report the first randomized trial to compare standard brief and low-dose gemcitabine. Patients Methods Eligible patients had non-small cell lung cancer stage IIIB (wet) or IV, Karnofsky performance status 100 70 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0–2), measurable disease, were chemonaive fulfilled criteria for chemotherapy. In arm A (standard treatment), gemcitabine was given at 1250 mg/m 2 20 30 minutes B (prolonged infusion) 250 6 hours infusion. All received on days 1 8 cisplatin 75 day 3-week cycle four cycles, followed by two cycles as monotherapy. Results total 249 (188 men 61 women, median age 58 years) between (125 patients) (124 patients). Adenocarcinoma (53.9%) predominant histologic type; 92% IV. The groups balanced prognostic factors; however, group fewer significant weight loss no patient second malignancy after radiotherapy brain metastases. Grade 3 greater toxicity rare: anemia 0.8 3.2%, neutropenia 21.6 22.6%, thrombocytopenia 0 1.6%, nausea/vomiting 4 8.1% arms B, respectively. Alopecia seen 54.5% compared 9.7% A. No died treatment-related toxicity. During 5, 47.7% 60.7% reported improved well-being, before complete remission, 32.8% partial responses, 48% minimal responses stable 13.6% progressions, 5.6% not evaluable. For corresponding figures are follows: remission 0.8%, 46% (for overall response rate 46.8%), disease 36.3%, progression 12.1%, evaluable 4.8%. Median progression-free survival 5.5 6.0 months, 10.1 10.0 1-year 46.6 41.1% 71 squamous carcinoma, seems superior A, higher (51.3 versus 35.5%), longer (6.2 4.9 months), (11.3 8.5 months). However, because small number patients, these differences did reach level statistical significance. Conclusion advanced cancer, combination has comparable Low-dose may be preferred incurable among economically deprivileged patients. addition, apparent carcinoma opens new perspectives deserves further research.

参考文章(29)
P. M. Parikh, P. Narayanan, R. C. Mistry, J. P. Agarwal, V. R. Pai, R. Nair, S. Gupta, P. S. Sastry, A. Vora, K. A. Dinshaw, Treatment of advanced NSCLC (Stage IIIB and IV) with low dose gemcitabine and carboplatin Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 23, pp. 7306- 7306 ,(2005) , 10.1200/JCO.2005.23.16_SUPPL.7306
Orhan Sezer, Jan Eucker, Christian Jakob, Olaf Kaufmann, Peter Schmid, Kurt Possinger, Achievement of complete remission in refractory Hodgkin's disease with prolonged infusion of gemcitabine. Investigational New Drugs. ,vol. 19, pp. 101- 104 ,(2001) , 10.1023/A:1006478702342
Camillo F. Pollera, Anna Ceribelli, Marcello Crecco, Cristina Oliva, Prolonged infusion gemcitabine: a clinical phase I study at low- (300 mg/m2) and high-dose (875 mg/m2) levels Investigational New Drugs. ,vol. 15, pp. 115- 121 ,(1997) , 10.1023/A:1005817024382
Frank V Fossella, Scott M Lippman, Dong M Shin, Peter Tarassoff, Maria Calayag-Jung, Roman Perez-Soler, Jin Soo Lee, William K Murphy, Bonnie Glisson, Edgardo Rivera, Waun Ki Hong, None, Maximum-tolerated dose defined for single-agent gemcitabine: a phase I dose-escalation study in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 15, pp. 310- 316 ,(1997) , 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.1.310
Stefan von Delius, Christian Lersch, Ewert Schulte-Frohlinde, Martina Mayr, Roland M Schmid, Florian Eckel, Phase II trial of weekly 24-hour infusion of gemcitabine in patients with advanced gallbladder and biliary tract carcinoma BMC Cancer. ,vol. 5, pp. 61- 61 ,(2005) , 10.1186/1471-2407-5-61
J L Abbruzzese, R Grunewald, E A Weeks, D Gravel, T Adams, B Nowak, S Mineishi, P Tarassoff, W Satterlee, M N Raber, A phase I clinical, plasma, and cellular pharmacology study of gemcitabine. Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 9, pp. 491- 498 ,(1991) , 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.3.491
Anna Ceribelli, Cesare Gridelli, Filippo De Marinis, Alessandra Fabi, Teresa Gamucci, Enrico Cortesi, Maria Barduagni, Mauro Antimi, Paolo Maione, Maria R Migliorino, Diana Giannarelli, Francesco Cognetti, None, Prolonged Gemcitabine Infusion in Advanced Non- Small Cell Lung Carcinoma A Randomized Phase II Study of Two Different Schedules in Combination with Cisplatin Cancer. ,vol. 98, pp. 337- 343 ,(2003) , 10.1002/CNCR.11501
Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton, Marianne Steding-Jessen, Mette Gislum, Kirsten Frederiksen, Gerda Engholm, Joachim Schüz, Social inequality and incidence of and survival from cancer in a population-based study in Denmark, 1994–2003: Background, aims, material and methods European Journal of Cancer. ,vol. 44, pp. 1938- 1949 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.EJCA.2008.06.010
M. Zwitter, V. Kovac, U. Smrdel, I. Kocijancic, B. Segedin, M. Vrankar, Phase I-II trial of low-dose gemcitabine in prolonged infusion and cisplatin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Anti-Cancer Drugs. ,vol. 16, pp. 1129- 1134 ,(2005) , 10.1097/00001813-200511000-00013
Cesare Gridelli, Ermelinda De Maio, Santi Barbera, Mirella Sannicolò, Elena Piazza, FrancoVito Piantedosi, Luigi Brancaccio, Alessandro Morabito, Paolo Maione, Francesco Renda, Giuseppe Signoriello, Francesco Perrone, MILES Investigators, None, The MILES-2G phase 2 study of single-agent gemcitabine with prolonged constant infusion in advanced non-small cell lung cancer elderly patients Lung Cancer. ,vol. 61, pp. 67- 72 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.LUNGCAN.2007.12.002