Student Motivation from and Resistance to Active Learning Rooted in Essential Science Practices

作者: David C. Owens , Troy D. Sadler , Angela T. Barlow , Cindi Smith-Walters

DOI: 10.1007/S11165-017-9688-1

关键词: Mathematics educationQualitative analysisCreativityScience educationResistance (psychoanalysis)Active learningConstruct (philosophy)Learning environmentConcept inventoryEducation

摘要: Several studies have found active learning to enhance students’ motivation and attitudes. Yet, faculty indicate that students resist censure them on evaluations after incorporating into their instruction, resulting in an apparent paradox. We argue the disparity findings across previous is result of variation instruction was implemented. The purpose this study illuminate sources from resistance resulted a novel, exemplary active-learning approach rooted essential science practices supported by education literature. This enacted over course 4 weeks eight sections introductory undergraduate biology laboratory course. A plant concept inventory, administered as pre-, post-, delayed-posttest indicated significant proximal distal gains. Qualitative analysis open-response questionnaires interviews elucidated approach. participants enhanced interest, creativity, prepare, challenging environment facilitated sharing diverse perspectives development community learners. Sources included participants’ unfamiliarity with practices, having struggle uncertainty absence authoritative information, extra effort required actively construct knowledge compared via traditional, teacher-centered instruction. Implications for implementation, including tips reducing student learning, are discussed.

参考文章(95)
Sumit Kundu, Michael W. Fowler, Use of Engineering Design Competitions for Undergraduate and Capstone Projects. Chemical engineering education. ,vol. 43, pp. 131- 136 ,(2009)
Margie Martyn, Clickers in the Classroom: An Active Learning Approach. Educause Quarterly. ,vol. 30, pp. 71- 74 ,(2007)
Gili Marbach-Ad, Phillip G. Sokolove, Good Science Begins with Good Questions: Answering the Need for High-Level Questions in Science. The journal of college science teaching. ,vol. 30, ,(2000)
Robert E. Slavin, Cooperative Learning: Student Teams. What Research Says to the Teacher. Second Edition. NEA Professional Library, P.O. Box 509, West Haven, CT 06516 ($2.50).. ,(1987)
Karen Maitland Schilling, Karl L. Schilling, Increasing Expectations for Student Effort. About Campus. ,vol. 4, pp. 4- 10 ,(1999) , 10.1177/108648229900400203
Alan Colburn, An Inquiry Primer. Science Scope. ,vol. 23, pp. 42- 44 ,(2000)
James A. Eison, Charles C. Bonwell, Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Washington, DC 20036-1183 ($17.00).. ,(1991)
Benchmarks for Increased Learning from Undergraduate Stem Instruction, Julie Anne Schuck, Richard McCray, Robert L. DeHaan, Improving undergraduate instruction in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics : report of a workshop National Academies Press. ,(2003)
David A Sousa, How the Brain Learns ,(2000)