Surgical treatment of bile peritonitis in 24 dogs and 2 cats: a retrospective study (1987-1994).

作者: LORI L. LUDWIG , MARY A. McLOUGHLIN , THOMAS K. GRAVES , M. SUSAN CRISP

DOI: 10.1111/J.1532-950X.1997.TB01470.X

关键词: CholecystitisClinical significanceSurgeryRetrospective cohort studyEffusionBiliary tractMedicineSurvival analysisWhite blood cellPeritonitis

摘要: Objective— The purpose of this study was to determine the signalment, history, clinical signs, diagnosis, treatment, outcome, and factors affecting outcome dogs cats surgically treated for bile peritonitis. Study Design— Retrospective study. Animals or Sample Population— Twenty-four two peritonitis. Methods— medical records biliary effusions at Ohio State University Michigan between 1987 1994 were reviewed. Statistical analysis performed compare outcome. Results— cause effusion determined in 24 animals, resulted from disruption tract secondary trauma (n = 13) necrotizing cholecystitis 11). Determination bilirubin concentration abdominal only diagnostic test that 100% effective diagnosing leakage before surgical intervention. consistently least times higher than serum concentration. Bacteriologic culture sensitivity revealed a septic, usually associated with multiple types gram-negative bacteria. overall survival rate 50% (13 26). peripheral white blood cell count significantly lower survivors (mean 20,608/uL) compared nonsurvivors 35,712/uL). immature neutrophil also 686/uL) (4,852/uL). Only 27% (3 11) animals septic survived. In contrast, (6 6) which no bacteria isolated Open drainage not successful treatment 7 9 effusions. Survival affected by distribution peritonitis, effusion, duration signs intervention. Conclusions— Patients sterile have much mortality those does require open drainage, is effusion. Clinical Relevance— This retrospective provides information may aid surgeon diagnosis peritonitis.

参考文章(25)
Walshaw R, Greenfield Cl, Open peritoneal drainage for treatment of contaminated peritoneal cavity and septic peritonitis in dogs and cats: 24 cases (1980-1986). Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association. ,vol. 191, pp. 100- 105 ,(1987)
Darvin H, Roslyn Jj, DenBesten L, Thompson Je, Risk factors for gallbladder perforation. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. ,vol. 82, pp. 636- 640 ,(1987)
J Kirpensteijn, T Ulrich, S W Allen, D A Sikkema, R B Fingland, Cholelithiasis in dogs: 29 cases (1980-1990). Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association. ,vol. 202, pp. 1137- 1142 ,(1993)
Patrick R. Felice, Phillip E. Trowbridge, John J. Ferrara, Evolving changes in the pathogenesis and treatment of the perforated gallbladder: a combined hospital study American Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 149, pp. 466- 473 ,(1985) , 10.1016/S0002-9610(85)80041-6
JOEL M. WOOLFSON, MARY L. DULISCH, Open Abdominal Drainage in the Treatment of Generalized Peritonitis in 25 Dogs and Cats Veterinary Surgery. ,vol. 15, pp. 27- 32 ,(1986) , 10.1111/J.1532-950X.1986.TB00169.X
Norman B. Ackerman, Leian F. Sillin, Kalkunte Suresh, Consequences of intraperitoneal bile: Bile ascites versus bile peritonitis American Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 149, pp. 244- 246 ,(1985) , 10.1016/S0002-9610(85)80078-7
Albert Mathieu, Office treatment of Bartholin's gland abscess or cyst American Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 36, pp. 219- 220 ,(1937) , 10.1016/S0002-9610(37)90816-X
GISELLE HOSGOOD, S. KATHLEEN SALISBURY, H. DAN CANTWELL, DENNIS B. DENICOLA, Intraperitoneal Circulation and Drainage in the Dog Veterinary Surgery. ,vol. 18, pp. 261- 268 ,(1989) , 10.1111/J.1532-950X.1989.TB01082.X
R. Andersson, K.-G. Tranberg, S. Bengmark, Roles of bile and bacteria in biliary peritonitis British Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 77, pp. 36- 39 ,(2005) , 10.1002/BJS.1800770113