Post-2020 Kunming 30% target can easily protect all endemic sharks and rays in the Western Indian Ocean and more

作者: Nicholas K. Dulvy , Rima W. Jabado , David A. Ebert , Jessica Cheok

DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.08.434293

关键词: Distribution (economics)GeographyThreatened speciesFisheryIndian oceanEndemismExclusive economic zoneBiodiversityMarine protected areaRange (biology)

摘要: Summary Sharks and rays are possibly the most threatened Class of marine fishes their declines can be halted if protected areas optimised to benefit these species. We identify spatial priorities for all 63 endemic sharks in biodiversity hotspot, Western Indian Ocean (WIO). Collectively, while WIO nations currently surpass 10% Aichi ocean protection target, this amounts a dismal only 1.57% each species’ distribution range. show that entire ranges endemics achieved by protecting 11% EEZs nations, well within reach new 30% oceans 2030 target. Regional management bodies exist, which taken advantage implement shark ray management, provide opportunities more efficient across region. recommend key actions explicit incentivisation international cooperation post-2020 framework. Science Society The past decade has seen massive growth establishment (MPAs), driven target areas. This expansion MPAs, however, largely occurred residual extractive uses, often coinciding with less lower conservation value. coming will see further push ensure 2030. It is important understand how existing future MPAs should placed biodiversity. Currently unclear rays, comprising species group evolutionarily distinct vertebrate radiation world also one threatened. both regional national expanding occurring find region already exceeded but an average top priority sites conserve almost half geographic range yet require 1.16% total EEZ – tiny fraction collaboration among result spatially priorities. framework needs explicitly incentivise between efficiently achieve urgent targets maximise benefits

参考文章(51)
Georgina G. Gurney, Robert L. Pressey, Natalie C. Ban, Jorge G. Álvarez-Romero, Stacy Jupiter, Vanessa M. Adams, Efficient and equitable design of marine protected areas in Fiji through inclusion of stakeholder-specific objectives in conservation planning. Conservation Biology. ,vol. 29, pp. 1378- 1389 ,(2015) , 10.1111/COBI.12514
J. Lubchenco, K. Grorud-Colvert, Making waves: The science and politics of ocean protection Science. ,vol. 350, pp. 382- 383 ,(2015) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.AAD5443
Mark J. Costello, Bill Ballantine, Biodiversity conservation should focus on no-take Marine Reserves: 94% of Marine Protected Areas allow fishing Trends in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 30, pp. 507- 509 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.TREE.2015.06.011
Rodolphe Devillers, Robert L. Pressey, Alana Grech, John N. Kittinger, Graham J. Edgar, Trevor Ward, Reg Watson, Reinventing residual reserves in the sea: are we favouring ease of establishment over need for protection? Aquatic Conservation-marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. ,vol. 25, pp. 480- 504 ,(2015) , 10.1002/AQC.2445
Nicholas K Dulvy, Yvonne Sadovy, John D Reynolds, Extinction vulnerability in marine populations Fish and Fisheries. ,vol. 4, pp. 25- 64 ,(2003) , 10.1046/J.1467-2979.2003.00105.X
Shelby Oliver, Matias Braccini, Stephen J. Newman, Euan S. Harvey, Global patterns in the bycatch of sharks and rays Marine Policy. ,vol. 54, pp. 86- 97 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.MARPOL.2014.12.017
Heike K. Lotze, Marta Coll, Anna M. Magera, Christine Ward-Paige, Laura Airoldi, Recovery of marine animal populations and ecosystems Trends in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 26, pp. 595- 605 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.TREE.2011.07.008
Elizabeth R. Selig, Will R. Turner, Sebastian Troëng, Bryan P. Wallace, Benjamin S. Halpern, Kristin Kaschner, Ben G. Lascelles, Kent E. Carpenter, Russell A. Mittermeier, Global Priorities for Marine Biodiversity Conservation PLoS ONE. ,vol. 9, pp. e82898- ,(2014) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0082898