Integration of a sensory component into the accommodation model reveals differences between emmetropia and late-onset myopia.

作者: B C Jiang

DOI:

关键词: Refractive errorSensory analysisAccommodationDark focusSensory thresholdOptometryAccommodative responsePsychologyEmmetropiaSensory system

摘要: Purpose To evaluate the differences in accommodative function between subjects with emmetropia and those late-onset myopia (LOM). Methods This study suggests a modified model of static accommodation, which an sensory gain as linear operator is added to simulate part system. Results derived from show that not only affects slope response but also increases system's effective threshold (ET) blur signal. method expands utility using control accommodation behavior. Thirteen emmetropic 10 LOM participated this study. The subject's responses one-, two-, three-, four-diopter stimuli were measured by Canon R-1 optometer, dark focus, function, ET compared subjects. results although dark-focus values slopes are significantly different LOM, ETs different. Conclusions higher found among either (or error) signal degraded system, dead space internal system high, or both factors important. On basis further analysis data, we speculate was less sensitive than

参考文章(26)
F Thorn, R Held, J Bauer, J Gwiazda, Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ,vol. 34, pp. 690- 694 ,(1993)
N A McBrien, M Millodot, Differences in adaptation of tonic accommodation with refractive state. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ,vol. 29, pp. 460- 469 ,(1988)
N A McBrien, M Millodot, The relationship between tonic accommodation and refractive error. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ,vol. 28, pp. 997- 1004 ,(1987)
Bai-Chuan Jiang, Parameters of accommodative and vergence systems and the development of late-onset myopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ,vol. 36, pp. 1737- 1742 ,(1995)
Harris Ripps, Goodwin M. Breinin, Irwin M. Siegel, Newton B. Chin, The effect of pupil size on accommodation, convergence, and the AC/A ratio. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ,vol. 1, pp. 127- 135 ,(1962)
Chris A. Johnson, Effects of luminance and stimulus distance on accommodation and visual resolution. Journal of the Optical Society of America. ,vol. 66, pp. 138- 142 ,(1976) , 10.1364/JOSA.66.000138
Robert T. Hennessy, Takeo Iida, Ken Shiina, H.W. Leibowitz, The effect of pupil size on accommodation Vision Research. ,vol. 16, pp. 587- 589 ,(1976) , 10.1016/0042-6989(76)90004-3
Li-Fang Hung, M.L.J. Crawford, Earl L. Smith, Spectacle lenses alter eye growth and the refractive status of young monkeys. Nature Medicine. ,vol. 1, pp. 761- 765 ,(1995) , 10.1038/NM0895-761
Kenneth J. Ciuffreda, Steven C. Hokoda, Spatial frequency dependence of accommodative responses in amblyopic eyes. Vision Research. ,vol. 23, pp. 1585- 1594 ,(1983) , 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90172-4
BERNARD GILMARTIN, MARK A. BULLIMORE, Adaptation of tonic accommodation to sustained visual tasks in emmetropia and late-onset myopia. Optometry and Vision Science. ,vol. 68, pp. 22- 26 ,(1991) , 10.1097/00006324-199101000-00004