Between clients and bureaucrats: An ambivalent position of NGOs in the social inclusion agenda in Czech statutory cities

作者: Karel Čada , Kateřina Ptáčková

DOI: 10.1016/J.POLSOC.2014.05.003

关键词: Public relationsAccountabilityPaternalismSociologyPublic administrationInterdependenceSocial workPoliticsWork (electrical)Statutory lawCorporate governance

摘要: Abstract This paper examines the landscape of policy work conducted by NGOs with respect to social inclusion agenda. Based on a qualitative case study integration in Czech city, focuses relations between collaborative and critical NGOs. In this case, while position is mainly justified apolitical expertise, long-term professional experience compliance official standards work, latter calls upon community-based knowledge political participation. We argue that despite indisputable benefits it includes risks paternalism, accountability deficit exclusiveness. These become more significant increasing shared understanding mutual interdependence. situation there room for episodic external capacity challenge governance structure enforce networks.

参考文章(32)
Eva Sørensen, Jacob Torfing, Jon Pierre, B. Guy Peters, Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm ,(2012)
Margarita I. Jeliazkova, Robertus Hoppe, How policymakers define their jobs: A Netherlands case study The work of policy. An international survey. pp. 35- 60 ,(2006)
Anne L. Schneider, Helen M. Ingram, Policy Design for Democracy ,(1997)
Brendan O'Leary, Patrick Dunleavy, Theories of the State: The Politics of Liberal Democracy ,(1987)
Ramya Ramanath, Alnoor Ebrahim, Strategies and Tactics in NGO-Government Relations: Insights from Slum Housing in Mumbai Nonprofit Management and Leadership. ,vol. 21, pp. 21- 42 ,(2010) , 10.1002/NML.20010
John Wanna, Janine O'Flynn, Janine O'Flynn, Collaborative Governance: A new era of public policy in Australia? ,(2011)