Supraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: Hand-sewn versus circular staples—a controlled clinical trial

作者: Abe Fingerhut , Jean-Marie Hay , André Elhadad , François Lacaine , Yves Flamant

DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6060(05)80362-9

关键词: Prospective cohort studyColon surgeryClinical trialSurgeryAnastomosisRectumMedicineRandomized controlled trialAgraffeSurgical anastomosis

摘要: Background Although used widely for supraperitoneal anastomoses, circular stapled anastomoses have never been proved better than hand-sewn anastomoses. In the one prospective controlled trial that studied these specifically, only significant difference found was there were more clinically obvious leakages with variety, but not in overall clinical and roentgenologic leakage rates. Methods. One hundred fifty-nine consecutive patients (88 men 71 women, mean age 65.8±12.1years) randomized to undergo (n=74) or (n=85) colorectal anastomosis after left colectomy. Results. Patient demographics similar both groups. Overall mortality 1.3% (2 of 159; each group). No statistically (NS) rate early complications, including anastomotic (4 74 versus 6 85) respectively). Mishaps (n=10) hemorrhage (n=5) occurred group only. Stapled took an average 8 minutes less perform (p Conclusions. According results, seems be no advantage routine regular use stapling instruments anastomosis.

参考文章(24)
Patricia L. Roberts, Warren A. Williamson, Laura B. Sanders, Pitfalls in use of stapler in gastrointestinal tract surgery. Surgical Clinics of North America. ,vol. 71, pp. 1247- 1257 ,(1991) , 10.1016/S0039-6109(16)45588-X
Lee Elton Smith, Anastomosis with EEA stapler after anterior colonic resection Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. ,vol. 24, pp. 236- 242 ,(1981) , 10.1007/BF02641867
G. D. Murray, Statistical aspects of research methodology. British Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 78, pp. 777- 781 ,(2005) , 10.1002/BJS.1800780704
Richard F. Brodman, Staple Suturing of the Colon Above the Peritoneal Reflection Archives of Surgery. ,vol. 116, pp. 191- 192 ,(1981) , 10.1001/ARCHSURG.1981.01380140041009
J. C. Goligher, P. W. R. Lee, J. Macfie, K. C. Simpkins, D. J. Lintott, Experience with the Russian model 249 suture gun for anastomosis of the rectum. Diseases of The Colon & Rectum. ,vol. 36, pp. 873- 880 ,(1993) , 10.1007/BF02047388
J. D. Beard, M. L. Nicholson, R. D. Sayers, D. Lloyd, N. W. Everson, Intraoperative air testing of colorectal anastomoses: A prospective, randomized trial web science. ,vol. 77, pp. 1095- 1097 ,(2005) , 10.1002/BJS.1800771006
Martin A. Luchtefeld, Jeffrey W. Milsom, Anthony Senagore, James A. Surrell, W. Patrick Mazier, Colorectal anastomotic stenosis results of a survey of the ASCRS membership Diseases of The Colon & Rectum. ,vol. 32, pp. 733- 736 ,(1989) , 10.1007/BF02562119
R.A. Bolton, D.C. Britton, RESTORATIVE SURGERY OF THE RECTUM WITH A CIRCUMFERENTIAL STAPLER The Lancet. ,vol. 315, pp. 850- 851 ,(1980) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(80)91355-0
W. G. Everett, P. J. Friend, J. Forty, Comparison of stapling and handsuture for left‐sided large bowel anastomosis British Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 73, pp. 345- 348 ,(2005) , 10.1002/BJS.1800730506
Adam J. Dziki, Mark D. Duncan, John W. Harmon, Nirmal Saini, Richard A. Malthaner, Karim S. Trad, Marie T. Fernicola, Fawaz Hakki, Richard M. Ugarte, Advantages of handsewn over stapled bowel anastomosis. Diseases of The Colon & Rectum. ,vol. 34, pp. 442- 448 ,(1991) , 10.1007/BF02049926