作者: Jean Raymond , Joseph Silvaggio , François Guilbert , Alain Weill , Daniel Roy
DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000183618.90388.F8
关键词: Credibility 、 Surgery 、 Medicine 、 Stroke 、 Surgical treatment 、 Intensive care medicine 、 Craving
摘要: To the Editor: In June 2004 issue of Stroke , Britz et al1 provide us with a clear example misleading information and nonscientific analysis. The credibility authority enjoyed by combined craving for any possible enlightenment on management unruptured intracranial aneurysms, strengthen impact such publication justify necessity to critically review this work. I would like rephrase problem which authors focused: My hypothesis is that physicians tend offer preventive but risky treatment patients who are most likely benefit. I believe be reasonable; in fact, all was shown study. If we retrospectively compare underwent operation those were denied surgery same condition, may end up …