Diagnostic performance of 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of glioma

作者: Tristan B Shaw , Rosalind L Jeffree , Paul Thomas , Steven Goodman , Maciej Debowski

DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12929

关键词: HistologyNuclear medicineBiopsyPositron emission tomographyFluorodeoxyglucoseGliomaPositive predicative valueDebulkingMedicineMagnetic resonance imaging

摘要: Introduction: Identifying glioma grade through imaging allows clinicians to recommend and accurately direct treatment. We sought quantify the utility of FDG-PET/CT (18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography), alone in combination with MRI, identifying high-grade regions glioma. Methods: This is a retrospective review patients who had an performed as part workup suspected or follow-up known scans were reviewed uptake identifiable lesion coded none, diffusely focally increased. Patients also underwent gadolinium-enhanced noting contrast enhancement. Sensitivity, specificity, positive negative predictive values (PPV NPV) calculated for identification histology (WHO III IV, metastatic disease) obtained post-FDG-PET/CT. Results: Thirty-three 36 MRI followed by histological confirmation (biopsy debulking). Increased FDG demonstrated sensitivity 59% specificity 79%, PPV 81% NPV 55% histology. 77% 86%, 89% 71% Only 64% scan series concordant. When concordant, 100% was achieved, however, 79% 75%. Conclusion: The marked improvement potential disease over each modality alone. without gadolinium enhancement rarely occurred identified small number patients. Due limited NPV, alone, should not guide decision observation where surgery would otherwise be recommended.

参考文章(29)
Giorgia Simonetti, Paola Gaviani, Andrea Botturi, Alessandro Innocenti, Elena Lamperti, Antonio Silvani, Clinical management of grade III oligodendroglioma. Cancer management and research. ,vol. 7, pp. 213- 223 ,(2015) , 10.2147/CMAR.S56975
Aurélien Corroyer-Dulmont, Ararat Chakhoyan, Solène Collet, Lucile Durand, Eric T. MacKenzie, Edwige Petit, Myriam Bernaudin, Omar Touzani, Samuel Valable, Imaging Modalities to Assess Oxygen Status in Glioblastoma. Frontiers of Medicine in China. ,vol. 2, pp. 57- 57 ,(2015) , 10.3389/FMED.2015.00057
Osamu Togao, Akio Hiwatashi, Koji Yamashita, Kazufumi Kikuchi, Masahiro Mizoguchi, Koji Yoshimoto, Satoshi O. Suzuki, Toru Iwaki, Makoto Obara, Marc Van Cauteren, Hiroshi Honda, Differentiation of high-grade and low-grade diffuse gliomas by intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging Neuro-oncology. ,vol. 18, pp. 132- 141 ,(2016) , 10.1093/NEUONC/NOV147
Sandip Basu, Abass Alavi, Molecular imaging (PET) of brain tumors. Neuroimaging Clinics of North America. ,vol. 19, pp. 625- 646 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.NIC.2009.08.012
Elizabeth B. Claus, Kyle M. Walsh, John K. Wiencke, Annette M. Molinaro, Joseph L. Wiemels, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Melissa L. Bondy, Mitchel Berger, Robert Jenkins, Margaret Wrensch, Survival and low-grade glioma: the emergence of genetic information. Neurosurgical Focus. ,vol. 38, ,(2015) , 10.3171/2014.10.FOCUS12367
R. Guillevin, G. Herpe, M. Verdier, C. Guillevin, Low-grade gliomas: The challenges of imaging Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging. ,vol. 95, pp. 957- 963 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.DIII.2014.07.005
Gabriele P�pperl, Claudia G�tz, Walter Rachinger, Franz-Josef Gildehaus, J�rg-Christian Tonn, Klaus Tatsch, Value of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)- L-tyrosine PET for the diagnosis of recurrent glioma European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. ,vol. 31, pp. 1464- 1470 ,(2004) , 10.1007/S00259-004-1590-1
Ajay Aggarwal, Naomi Herz, Philip Campbell, Leo Arkush, Susan Short, Jeremy Rees, Diagnostic delay and survival in high-grade gliomas - evidence of the 'waiting time paradox'? British Journal of Neurosurgery. ,vol. 29, pp. 520- 523 ,(2015) , 10.3109/02688697.2015.1012050
Massimo Caulo, Valentina Panara, Domenico Tortora, Peter A. Mattei, Chiara Briganti, Emanuele Pravatà, Simone Salice, Antonio R. Cotroneo, Armando Tartaro, Data-driven Grading of Brain Gliomas: A Multiparametric MR Imaging Study Radiology. ,vol. 272, pp. 494- 503 ,(2014) , 10.1148/RADIOL.14132040
Vincent Dunet, Anastasia Pomoni, Andreas Hottinger, Marie Nicod-Lalonde, John O. Prior, Performance of 18F-FET versus 18F-FDG-PET for the diagnosis and grading of brain tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuro-oncology. ,vol. 18, pp. 426- 434 ,(2016) , 10.1093/NEUONC/NOV148