The tumescent technique: the effect of high tissue pressure and dilute epinephrine on absorption of lidocaine.

作者: Peter J. Rubin , Clifford Bierman , Carl E. Rosow , Richard G. Arthur , YuChiao Chang

DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199903000-00036

关键词: AnesthesiaSalineLiposuctionAbsorption (skin)LidocaineEpinephrineLocal anestheticSodium bicarbonateMedicineHydrostatic pressure

摘要: Injection of lidocaine into the subcutaneous tissues by tumescent technique results in a delayed absorption local anesthetic and has allowed clinicians to exceed maximum recommended dose without reported complications. However, little knowledge exists about mechanisms that permit such high doses be used safely with this technique. The presence low concentration epinephrine increased tissue pressure resulting from injection have both been implicated as important factors, but neither studied patients whose were not altered variability suction procedure. purpose work was determine effect during on human volunteers. Twenty healthy female volunteers randomized four study groups. After body fat measurements, all subjects received an 7 mg/kg lateral thighs. injected solution consisted 0.1% 12.5 meq/liter sodium bicarbonate normal saline or 1:1,000,000 epinephrine. Tissue recorded using specially designed double-barreled needle. time required for also recorded. Subjects group 1 high-pressure Group 2 low-pressure 3 under pressure. 4 Following injection, sequential blood samples drawn over 14-hour period, plasma concentrations determined gas chromatography. No lipectomy performed. Maximum 339 +/- 63 mmHg 27 9 high- techniques, respectively. Addition epinephrine, regardless fluid, significantly peak hours. There no significant difference among Peak greater than mcg/ml seen 11 subjects. Epinephrine (1:1,000,000) delays administered High generated does affect absorption. delay may allow some removed lipectomy. In addition, slow rise groups development systemic tolerance levels.

参考文章(27)
Hortobagyi T, McCammon Mr, Israel Rg, O'Brien Kf, Eaton Aw, Comparison of four methods to assess body composition in women. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. ,vol. 47, pp. 353- 360 ,(1993)
Jeffrey Alan Klein, The tumescent technique. Anesthesia and modified liposuction technique. Dermatologic Clinics. ,vol. 8, pp. 425- 437 ,(1990) , 10.1016/S0733-8635(18)30474-1
Francis F. Foldes, COMPARISON OF TOXICITY OF INTRAVENOUSLY GIVEN LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENTS IN MAN Journal of the American Medical Association. ,vol. 172, pp. 1493- 1498 ,(1960) , 10.1001/JAMA.1960.03020140029007
F GRAZER, F MEISTER, Factors contributing to adverse effects of the tumescent technique. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. ,vol. 17, pp. 411- 413 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S1090-820X(97)80060-X
PATRICK J. LILLIS, Liposuction surgery under local anesthesia: limited blood loss and minimal lidocaine absorption. The Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology. ,vol. 14, pp. 1145- 1148 ,(1988) , 10.1111/J.1524-4725.1988.TB03472.X
RICHARD J. SIEGEL, LARS M. VISTNES, RONALD E. IVERSON, Effective hemostasis with less epinephrine. An experimental and clinical study. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. ,vol. 51, pp. 129- 133 ,(1973) , 10.1097/00006534-197302000-00003
JEFFREY A. KLEIN, Anesthesia for Liposuction in Dermatologic Surgery The Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology. ,vol. 14, pp. 1124- 1132 ,(1988) , 10.1111/J.1524-4725.1988.TB03469.X
Frode Samdal, Petter F. Amland, Jan F. Bugge, Plasma lidocaine levels during suction-assisted lipectomy using large doses of dilute lidocaine with epinephrine. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. ,vol. 93, pp. 1217- 1223 ,(1994) , 10.1097/00006534-199405000-00017
Suzanne A. Trott, Samuel J. Beran, Rod J. Rohrich, Jeffrey M. Kenkel, William P. Adams, Kevin W. Klein, Safety considerations and fluid resuscitation in liposuction: an analysis of 53 consecutive patients. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. ,vol. 102, pp. 2220- 2229 ,(1998) , 10.1097/00006534-199811000-00063
Bradon J. Wilhelmi, Steven J. Blackwell, John Miller, John S. Mancoll, Linda G. Phillips, Epinephrine in digital blocks: revisited. Annals of Plastic Surgery. ,vol. 41, pp. 410- 414 ,(1998) , 10.1097/00000637-199810000-00010