Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with an aortic bioprosthetic valve: comparison of stentless versus stented bioprostheses.

作者: Philippe Pibarot , Jean G. Dumesnil , Jean Jobin , Paul Cartier , George Honos

DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00360-5

关键词: In patientInternal medicineMedicineBioprosthetic valveBody surface areaMaximal exerciseHemodynamicsCardiologyDoppler echocardiographyProsthesisPhysical performance

摘要: Abstract OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to compare stentless bioprostheses with stented regard their hemodynamic behavior during exercise. BACKGROUND Stentless aortic have better performances at rest than bioprostheses, but very few comparisons were performed METHODS Thirty-eight patients normally functioning (n = 19) or submitted a maximal ramp upright bicycle exercise test. Valve effective orifice area and mean transvalvular pressure gradient peak successfully measured using Doppler echocardiography in 30 the 38 patients. RESULTS At exercise, increased significantly less (+5 ± 3 vs. +12 8 mm Hg; p 0.002) despite similar increases flow rates (+137 58 +125 65 ml/s; 0.58); valve also no significant difference between groups. Despite difference, capacity not different, left ventricular (LV) mass function closer normal bioprostheses. Overall, there strong inverse relation indexed (r 0.90). CONCLUSIONS Hemodynamics are due larger resting This is associated beneficial effects LV function. found can be used project these time operation. It should thus useful select optimal prosthesis given patient’s body surface level physical activity.

参考文章(25)
Neil McCartney, Christine Hitchcock, Lydia Makrides, Tanya Chypchar, Norman L. Jones, Normal standards for an incremental progressive cycle ergometer test. The American review of respiratory disease. ,vol. 131, pp. 700- 708 ,(1985) , 10.1164/ARRD.1985.131.5.700
Legget Me, Healy Nl, Fujioka M, Schwaegler R, Otto Cm, Munt Bi, Effects of aortic valve replacement on exercise duration and functional status in adults with valvular aortic stenosis. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. ,vol. 13, pp. 346- 350 ,(1997)
Jean G. Dumesnil, George N. Honos, Michel Lemieux, Jocelyn Beauchemin, Validation of applications of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography Journal of the American College of Cardiology. ,vol. 16, pp. 637- 643 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90355-S
Stephen Westaby, Naomali Amarasena, Vanessa Long, Anthony Prothero, G.A. Chandima Amarasena, Adrian P. Banning, Ravi Pillai, Oliver Ormerod, Time-related hemodynamic changes after aortic replacement with the freestyle stentless xenograft. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. ,vol. 60, pp. 1633- 1639 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00639-7
Renée B.A. van den Brink, Hans A. Verheul, Cees A. Visser, Mark J.W. Koelemay, Arend J. Dunning, Value of exercise Doppler echocardiography in patients with prosthetic or bioprosthetic cardiac valves American Journal of Cardiology. ,vol. 69, pp. 367- 372 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90235-Q
S. Takeda, H.M. Rimington, J.B. Chambers, The use of the pressure drop-flow slope as a measure of severity in patients with aortic stenosis Journal of the American College of Cardiology. ,vol. 31, pp. 246- ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)81709-9
Dario F. Del Rizzo, Bernard S. Goldman, Campbell P. Joyner, Jeri Sever, Steven E. Fremes, George T. Christakis, Initial Clinical Experience with the Toronto Stentless Porcine ValveTM Journal of Cardiac Surgery. ,vol. 9, pp. 379- 385 ,(1994) , 10.1111/J.1540-8191.1994.TB00865.X
Bruce K Shively, Gerald A Charlton, Michael H Crawford, Rachel K Chaney, Flow dependence of valve area in aortic stenosis: relation to valve morphology. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. ,vol. 31, pp. 654- 660 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00532-9
Philippe Pibarot, George N. Honos, Louis-Gilles Durand, Jean G. Dumesnil, Substitution of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Diameter With Prosthesis Size is Inadequate for Calculation of the Aortic Prosthetic Valve Area by the Continuity Equation Journal of The American Society of Echocardiography. ,vol. 8, pp. 511- 517 ,(1995) , 10.1016/S0894-7317(05)80339-6