Clustering based assessment of cost, security and environmental tradeoffs with possible future electricity generation portfolios

作者: Yusak Tanoto , Navid Haghdadi , Anna Bruce , Iain MacGill

DOI: 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2020.115219

关键词: Environmental economicsElectricity generationElectricityElectricity marketPortfolioElectric power systemPhotovoltaic systemElectric power industryEvolutionary programmingComputer science

摘要: Abstract The electricity sector has a key role to play in the sustainable energy transition. falling costs of wind and solar PV have added both opportunities yet also challenges balancing sometimes competing industry objectives costs, security, environmental impacts. This paper presents novel techniques for assessing possible future generation portfolios three ways: (1) incorporating explicit metrics trilemma into modelling, (2) using optimization process evolutionary programming map solution space ‘high performing’, near least-cost, portfolio solutions, (3) applying boundary min–max cases clustering categorize these varied better facilitate planning policy making. We use an open-source tool, National Electricity Market Optimiser, assess Indonesia’s Java-Bali interconnected power system. Our findings highlight wide range that might potentially deliver similar total their different security implications. In particular, additional photovoltaic deployment appears low-risk opportunity reduce emissions compared more fossil-fuel oriented mixes. may be useful modelling community seeking understand communicate complex, uncertain, multi-dimensional choices planning.

参考文章(34)
S. Saitta, B. Raphael, I.F.C. Smith, A comprehensive validity index for clustering intelligent data analysis. ,vol. 12, pp. 529- 548 ,(2008) , 10.3233/IDA-2008-12602
Frank Kreith, Paul Norton, Daryl Brown, A comparison of CO2 emissions from fossil and solar power plants in the United States Energy. ,vol. 15, pp. 1181- 1198 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0360-5442(90)90110-N
Neil Gunningham, Managing the energy trilemma: The case of Indonesia☆ Energy Policy. ,vol. 54, pp. 184- 193 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2012.11.018
M.W. Thring, World Energy Outlook Electronics and Power. ,vol. 23, pp. 329- ,(1977) , 10.1049/EP.1977.0180
Joshua D. Rhodes, Wesley J. Cole, Charles R. Upshaw, Thomas F. Edgar, Michael E. Webber, Clustering analysis of residential electricity demand profiles Applied Energy. ,vol. 135, pp. 461- 471 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2014.08.111
David L. Davies, Donald W. Bouldin, A Cluster Separation Measure IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. ,vol. 1, pp. 224- 227 ,(1979) , 10.1109/TPAMI.1979.4766909
Anne Auger, Nikolaus Hansen, Tutorial CMA-ES: evolution strategies and covariance matrix adaptation genetic and evolutionary computation conference. pp. 827- 848 ,(2012) , 10.1145/2330784.2330919
Fintan McLoughlin, Aidan Duffy, Michael Conlon, A clustering approach to domestic electricity load profile characterisation using smart metering data Applied Energy. ,vol. 141, pp. 190- 199 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2014.12.039