Melatonin Suppression by Static and Extremely Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields: Relationship to the Reported Increased Incidence of Cancer

作者: Rüssel J Reiter

DOI: 10.1515/REVEH.1994.10.3-4.171

关键词: Internal medicineNocturnalHormoneCircadian rhythmMelatoninEndocrinologyExtremely low frequencyPineal glandCarcinogenMedicineCancerPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthPollutionHealth(social science)

摘要: An increased cancer incidence has been reported in individuals living and/or working an environment which they are exposed to higher than normal artificial electromagnetic fields. One of the most uniform changes associated with exposure animals either pulsed static geomagnetic fields or sinusoidal extremely low frequency magnetic a reduction high night-time levels melatonin. Melatonin is hormone produced especially at night pineal gland, pea-sized organ near center human brain. The nocturnal production melatonin leads elevated blood as well. humans light (visible radiation) rapidly depresses and levels. Likewise, various also reduces potent oncostatic agent it prevents both initiation promotion cancer. Reduction melatonin, night, by any means, increases cells' vulnerability alteration carcinogenic agents. Thus, if fact field humans, plausible mechanism could involve consequence such exposures.

参考文章(54)
Russel J Reiter, Interactions of the pineal hormone melatonin with oxygen-centered free radicals: a brief review. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. ,vol. 26, pp. 1141- 1155 ,(1993)
Peter Semm, Pineal Function in Mammals and Birds is Altered by Earth-Strength Magnetic Fields Electromagnetic Fields and Circadian Rhythmicity. pp. 53- 62 ,(1992) , 10.1007/978-1-4684-6799-4_4
Shirley-Henderson A, Goodman R, Exposure of cells to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields: relationship to malignancy? Cancer Cell. ,vol. 2, pp. 355- 359 ,(1990)
Russel J. Reiter, Bruce A. Richardson, Magnetic field effects on pineal indoleamine metabolism and possible biological consequences. The FASEB Journal. ,vol. 6, pp. 2283- 2287 ,(1992) , 10.1096/FASEBJ.6.6.1544540
Richard G. Stevens, Scott Davis, David B. Thomas, Larry E. Anderson, Bary W. Wilson, Electric power, pineal function, and the risk of breast cancer. The FASEB Journal. ,vol. 6, pp. 853- 860 ,(1992) , 10.1096/FASEBJ.6.3.1740235
W R Adey, Tissue interactions with nonionizing electromagnetic fields. Physiological Reviews. ,vol. 61, pp. 435- 514 ,(1981) , 10.1152/PHYSREV.1981.61.2.435
RICHARD G. STEVENS, ELECTRIC POWER USE AND BREAST CANCER: A HYPOTHESIS American Journal of Epidemiology. ,vol. 125, pp. 556- 561 ,(1987) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.AJE.A114569
Paul A. Demers, David B. Thomas, Karin A. Rosenblatt, L. Margarita Jimenez, Anne McTiernan, Helge Stalsberg, Annette Stemhagen, W. Douglas Thompson, Mary G. McCrea Curnen, William Satariano, Donald F. Austin, Peter Isacson, Raymond S. Greenberg, Charles Key, Laurence N. Kolonel, Dee W. West, Occupational Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields and Breast Cancer in Men American Journal of Epidemiology. ,vol. 134, pp. 340- 347 ,(1991) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.AJE.A116095