作者: Oliver P. Thomson , Nicola J. Petty , Ann P. Moore
DOI: 10.1016/J.MATH.2013.07.008
关键词: Grounded theory 、 Qualitative research 、 Psychology 、 Rationality 、 Construct (philosophy) 、 Alternative medicine 、 Therapeutic approach 、 Psychotherapist 、 Osteopathy 、 Theoretical sampling
摘要: There is limited understanding of how osteopaths make decisions in relation to clinical practice. The aim this research was construct an explanatory theory the decision-making and therapeutic approaches experienced UK. Twelve UK registered participated constructivist grounded qualitative study. Purposive theoretical sampling used select participants. Data collected using semi-structured interviews which were audio-recorded transcribed. As study approached sufficiency, participants observed video-recorded during a patient appointment, followed by video-prompted interview. Constant comparative analysis analyse code data. resulted construction three qualitatively different characterised their practice, termed; Treater, Communicator Educator. Participants' approach influenced decision-making, level involvement, interaction with patients, goals. overall conception practice lay on continuum ranging from technical rationality professional artistry, contributed approach. A range factors identified participants' findings indicate that there variation osteopaths' are This provides first osteopaths.