Adaptive capacity indicators to assess sustainability of urban water systems - Current application.

作者: Marc Spiller

DOI: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2016.06.088

关键词: Adaptive capacityEnvironmental Sustainability IndexSustainabilitySustainable developmentEnvironmental economicsSocial sustainabilitySustainability studiesFunction (engineering)Sustainability organizationsBusinessEnvironmental resource management

摘要: Sustainability is commonly assessed along environmental, societal, economic and technological dimensions. A crucial aspect of sustainability that inter-generational equality must be ensured. This requires attained in the here now as well into future. Therefore, what perceived 'sustainable' changes a function societal opinion scientific progress. concept describes ability systems to change adaptive capacity. Literature suggests adapt an integral part sustainable development. paper demonstrates indicators measuring capacity are underrepresented current urban water studies. Furthermore, it discussed under which dimensions lacking why. Of >90 analysed, only nine indicators, six socio-cultural, two technological, one economical none environmental. infrequent use assessments led conclusion challenge dynamic uncertain is, with exception socio-cultural dimension, not yet sufficiently reflected application indicators. raises concerns about progress towards can transform response variation change. research should focus on developing methods define, evaluate quantify economic, environmental technical dimension sustainability. evaluated whether frameworks control processes more suitable for capacity, than

参考文章(67)
Jonathan N. Maack, Mary Anne Casey, Stuart Kirsch, Richard A. Krueger, Jonathan Donner, Social analysis : selected tools and techniques pp. 1- ,(2001)
Jon Røstum, Kees van Leeuwen, Nuno F. da Cruz, Rui Cunha Marquez, Marielle Zouwen, MCDA approach for the UWCS sustainability scorecards TRansitions to the Urban Water Services of Tomorrow. ,(2012)
Gro Harlem Brundtland, Our common future Earth and Us#R##N#Population–Resources–Environment–Development. pp. 29- 31 ,(1987) , 10.1016/B978-0-7506-1049-0.50009-5
Timothy Lynam, Wil de Jong, Douglas Sheil, Trikurnianti Kusumanto, Kirsten Evans, A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences, and values into decision making in natural resources management Ecology and Society. ,vol. 12, pp. 5- ,(2007) , 10.5751/ES-01987-120105
P.A. Wilderer, D. Schreff, Decentralized and centralized wastewater management: a challenge for technology developers Water Science and Technology. ,vol. 41, pp. 1- 8 ,(2000) , 10.2166/WST.2000.0001
B Smit, O Pilifosova, I Burton, B Challenger, S Huq, RJT Klein, G Yohe, A Adger, T Downing, E Harvey, S Kane, M Parry, M Skinner, J Smith, J Wandel, A Patwardhan, J-F Soussana, Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development and equity Cambridge University Press. ,(2001)
Brian Walker, Jacqueline A. Meyers, Thresholds in Ecological and Social–Ecological Systems: a Developing Database Ecology and Society. ,vol. 9, pp. 3- ,(2004) , 10.5751/ES-00664-090203
Margareta Lundin, Indicators for Measuring the Sustainability of Urban Water Systems - A Life Cycle Approach Chalmers University of Technology. ,(2003)
Rui Cunha Marques, Nuno Ferreira da Cruz, Joao Pires, None, Measuring the sustainability of urban water services Environmental Science & Policy. ,vol. 54, pp. 142- 151 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.ENVSCI.2015.07.003
S.A. Fane, N.J. Ashbolt, S.B. White, Decentralised urban water reuse: the implications of system scale for cost and pathogen risk. Water Science and Technology. ,vol. 46, pp. 281- 288 ,(2002) , 10.2166/WST.2002.0690