Pilot Validation Study of the European Association of Urology Robotic Training Curriculum

作者: Alessandro Volpe , Kamran Ahmed , Prokar Dasgupta , Vincenzo Ficarra , Giacomo Novara

DOI: 10.1016/J.EURURO.2014.10.025

关键词: CurriculumTraining curriculumPanel discussionProstatectomyMedicineSurgeryScale (social sciences)Medical physicsFace validityRobotic Surgical ProceduresAssociation (psychology)

摘要: Abstract Background The development of structured and validated training curricula is one the current priorities in robot-assisted urological surgery. Objective To establish feasibility, acceptability, face validity, educational impact a curriculum for radical prostatectomy (RARP), to assess improvements performance ability perform RARP after completion curriculum. Design, setting, participants A 12-wk was developed based on an expert panel discussion used train ten fellows from major European teaching institutions. included: (1) e-learning, (2) 1 wk simulation-based (virtual reality synthetic, animal, cadaveric platforms), (3) supervised modular RARP. Outcome measurements statistical analysis were assessed using quantitative surveys. Improvement technical skills over period evaluated inbuilt assessment metrics da Vinci surgical simulator (dVSS). final performed by their Global Evaluative Assessment Robotic Skills (GEARS) score generic procedure-specific scoring criteria. Results limitations median baseline experience as console surgeon 4 mo (interquartile range [IQR] 0–6.5 mo). All completed involved 18 RARPs (IQR 14–36) during training. overall dVSS tasks significantly increased ( p 10 (scale 4–16) all procedural steps dedicated tool. In comparison this tool, experts outperformed (mean 13.6 vs 11). Conclusions urologic acceptable, valid, effective Patient summary This study shows that program including mentored operating room allows surgeons with limited robotic increase prostatectomy.

参考文章(17)
Roger Smith, Vipul Patel, Richard Satava, Fundamentals of robotic surgery: a course of basic robotic surgery skills based upon a 14-society consensus template of outcomes measures and curriculum development The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. ,vol. 10, pp. 379- 384 ,(2014) , 10.1002/RCS.1559
Andrew P Stegemann, Kamran Ahmed, Johar R Syed, Shabnam Rehman, Khurshid Ghani, Ricardo Autorino, Mohamed Sharif, Amrith Rao, Yi Shi, Gregory E Wilding, James M Hassett, Ashirwad Chowriappa, Thenkurussi Kesavadas, James O Peabody, Mani Menon, Jihad Kaouk, Khurshid Ahad Guru, None, Fundamental Skills of Robotic Surgery: A Multi-institutional Randomized Controlled Trial for Validation of a Simulation-based Curriculum Urology. ,vol. 81, pp. 767- 774 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2012.12.033
Roger L. Kneebone, Practice, Rehearsal, and Performance JAMA. ,vol. 302, pp. 1336- 1338 ,(2009) , 10.1001/JAMA.2009.1392
Daniel Hay, Mohammed Shamim Khan, Hendrik Van Poppel, Ben Van Cleynenbreugel, James Peabody, Khurshid Guru, Ben Challacombe, Prokar Dasgupta, Kamran Ahmed, Current status and effectiveness of mentorship programmes in urology: a systematic review. BJUI. ,vol. 116, pp. 487- 494 ,(2015) , 10.1111/BJU.12713
Kirsten Foell, Antonio Finelli, Kazuhiro Yasufuku, Marcus Q Bernardini, Thomas K Waddell, Kenneth T Pace, R John D’A Honey, Jason Y Lee, None, Robotic surgery basic skills training: Evaluation of a pilot multidisciplinary simulation-based curriculum. Cuaj-canadian Urological Association Journal. ,vol. 7, pp. 430- 434 ,(2013) , 10.5489/CUAJ.222
James Brewin, Kamran Ahmed, Ben Challacombe, An update and review of simulation in urological training International Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 12, pp. 103- 108 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.IJSU.2013.11.012
Leanne M. Sutherland, Philippa F. Middleton, Adrian Anthony, Jeffrey Hamdorf, Patrick Cregan, David Scott, Guy J. Maddern, Surgical simulation: a systematic review. Annals of Surgery. ,vol. 243, pp. 291- 300 ,(2006) , 10.1097/01.SLA.0000200839.93965.26
Kevin C. Zorn, Gagan Gautam, Arieh L. Shalhav, Ralph V. Clayman, Thomas E. Ahlering, David M. Albala, David I. Lee, Chandru P. Sundaram, Surena F. Matin, Erik P. Castle, Howard N. Winfield, Matthew T. Gettman, Benjamin R. Lee, Raju Thomas, Vipul R. Patel, Raymond J. Leveillee, Carson Wong, Gopal H. Badlani, Koon H. Rha, Scott E. Eggener, Peter Wiklund, Alex Mottrie, Fatih Atug, Ali R. Kural, Jean V. Joseph, , Training, Credentialing, Proctoring and Medicolegal Risks of Robotic Urological Surgery: Recommendations of the Society of Urologic Robotic Surgeons Journal of Urology. ,vol. 182, pp. 1126- 1132 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.JURO.2009.05.042
Kamran Ahmed, Muhammed Jawad, Prokar Dasgupta, Ara Darzi, Thanos Athanasiou, Mohammad Shamim Khan, None, Assessment and maintenance of competence in urology. Nature Reviews Urology. ,vol. 7, pp. 403- 413 ,(2010) , 10.1038/NRUROL.2010.81
Daniel J. Scott, Patient safety, competency, and the future of surgical simulation. Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. ,vol. 1, pp. 164- 170 ,(2006) , 10.1097/01.SIH.0000244453.20671.F2