The Duty to Give Reasons in the European Legal Area: a Mechanism for Transparent and Accountable Administrative Decision-Making? A Comparison of Belgian, Dutch, French and EU Administrative Law
作者： Ingrid Opdebeek , Stéphanie De Somer
DOI: 10.4467/24497800RAP.16.007.5100
关键词: Law 、 Context (language use) 、 Administrative law 、 Administration (probate law) 、 Transparency (behavior) 、 Good governance 、 Subject (philosophy) 、 Duty 、 Accountability 、 Political science
摘要: The duty to give reasons is generally thought of as an indispensable procedural guarantee that offered citizens in all modern European administrative law systems. comparative analysis carried out this article, however, reveals important differences continue exist between the way which various legal systems within Europe conceive duty. article furthermore argues has role play furtherance transparency and accountability principles good governance. However, it also its limitations instrument for keeping administration accountable. Up until today, primarily a role relationship those individuals are subject specic (mostly individual) decisions. In context, question arises whether status evolving towards individual human right
sci-hub.st 参考文章(29)
Karine Michelet, ETUDES - La Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union européenne et la procédure administrative non contentieuse Actualité juridique. Edition droit administratif. pp. 949- 955 ,(2002)
Peter L. Lindseth, Power and Legitimacy: Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State ,(2010)
Alexander Turk, Herwig C.H. Hofmann, Legal Challenges in EU Administrative Law: Towards an Integrated Administration ,(2009)
Jerry L Mashaw, Reasoned Administration: The European Union, the United States, and the Project of Democratic Governance Social Science Research Network. ,(2007)
Richard G Mulgan, Holding Power to Account: Accountability in Modern Democracies ,(2003)
Alexander H. Türk, Gerard C. Rowe, Herwig C.H. Hofmann, Administrative Law and Policy of the European Union ,(2011)
Susan Rose-Ackerman, Peter L. Lindseth, Comparative Administrative Law: Outlining a Field of Study Social Science Research Network. ,(2010)
Maurice Adams, De argumentatieve en motiveringspraktijk van hoogste gerechtshoven : Rechtsvergelijkende beschouwingen Rechtskundig weekblad. - Antwerpen. ,vol. 72, pp. 1498- 1511 ,(2009)
Deirdre Curtin, Holding (Quasi-)Autonomous EU Administrative Actors to Public Account European Law Journal. ,vol. 13, pp. 523- 541 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1468-0386.2007.00382.X
Mark Bovens, Two Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism West European Politics. ,vol. 33, pp. 946- 967 ,(2010) , 10.1080/01402382.2010.486119