Toward the Next Generation of Assessment

作者: Katharine J. Mach , Christopher B. Field

DOI: 10.1146/ANNUREV-ENVIRON-102016-061007

关键词: Management scienceComplex problemsEnvironmental resource managementClimate changeSociologyFutures contractClimate change assessment

摘要: Through integrative assessment, experts evaluate the state of knowledge on complex problems relevant to societies. In this review, we take stock recent advances and challenges, rooting our analysis in climate change assessment. particular, consider four priorities assessment: (a) integrating diverse evidence including quantitative qualitative results understanding, (b) applying rigorous expert judgment its uncertainties, (c) exploring widely ranging futures their connections ongoing choices actions, (d) incorporating interactions among decision makers assessment processes. Across these priorities, survey past experiences, current practices, possibilities for future experimentation, innovation, learning. era broader global change, can bolster decisions about contested uncertain futures. We both opportunities pitfalls synthesizing encompassing e...

参考文章(96)
Esteve Corbera, Laura Calvet-Mir, Hannah Hughes, Matthew Paterson, None, Patterns of authorship in the IPCC Working Group III report Nature Climate Change. ,vol. 6, pp. 94- 99 ,(2016) , 10.1038/NCLIMATE2782
Martin Kowarsch, Policy assessments to enhance EU scientific advice Nature Climate Change. ,vol. 6, pp. 15- 17 ,(2016) , 10.1038/NCLIMATE2835
Walter V Reid, Harold A Mooney, The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Testing the Limits of Interdisciplinary and Multi-scale Science Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. ,vol. 19, pp. 40- 46 ,(2016) , 10.1016/J.COSUST.2015.11.009
Nancy Fresco, Kristin Timm, Fostering Resilience in the Face of an Uncertain Future: Using Scenario Planning to Communicate Climate Change Risks and Collaboratively Develop Adaptation Strategies Communicating Climate-Change and Natural Hazard Risk and Cultivating Resilience. pp. 79- 94 ,(2016) , 10.1007/978-3-319-20161-0_6
Katharine J. Mach, Michael D. Mastrandrea, T. Eren Bilir, Christopher B. Field, Understanding and responding to danger from climate change: the role of key risks in the IPCC AR5 Climatic Change. ,vol. 136, pp. 427- 444 ,(2016) , 10.1007/S10584-016-1645-X
Kjersti Fløttum, Des Gasper, Asuncion Lera St. Clair, Synthesizing a policy-relevant perspective from the three IPCC “Worlds”—A comparison of topics and frames in the SPMs of the Fifth Assessment Report Global Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions. ,vol. 38, pp. 118- 129 ,(2016) , 10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2016.03.007
Michael Oppenheimer, Christopher M. Little, Roger M. Cooke, Expert judgement and uncertainty quantification for climate change Nature Climate Change. ,vol. 6, pp. 445- 451 ,(2016) , 10.1038/NCLIMATE2959
Paul G. Bain, Taciano L. Milfont, Yoshihisa Kashima, Michał Bilewicz, Guy Doron, Ragna B. Garðarsdóttir, Valdiney V. Gouveia, Yanjun Guan, Lars-Olof Johansson, Carlota Pasquali, Victor Corral-Verdugo, Juan Ignacio Aragones,, Akira Utsugi, Christophe Demarque, Siegmar Otto, Joonha Park, Martin Soland, Linda Steg, Roberto González, Nadezhda Lebedeva, Ole Jacob Madsen, Claire Wagner, Charity S. Akotia, Tim Kurz, José L. Saiz, P.Wesley Schultz, Gró Einarsdóttir, Nina M. Saviolidis, Corrigendum: Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world (Nature Climate Change (2016) 6 (154-157)) Nature Climate Change. ,vol. 6, pp. 538- 538 ,(2016) , 10.1038/NCLIMATE2990
Gabrielle Wong-Parodi, Tamar Krishnamurti, Alex Davis, Daniel Schwartz, Baruch Fischhoff, A decision science approach for integrating social science in climate and energy solutions Nature Climate Change. ,vol. 6, pp. 563- 569 ,(2016) , 10.1038/NCLIMATE2917