Deliberative capacity in the intellectual property rights regime complex

作者: Jonathan Kuyper

DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2015.1032991

关键词: ArgumentDeliberationDeliberative democracyGlobal governanceEconomic systemPoliticsIntellectual propertyEconomicsLaw and economicsHuman rightsDemocratic deficit

摘要: World politics is increasingly described in terms of regime complexity – the proliferation regulatory arrangements operating within same policy domain. This concept has been fruitfully applied to a variety fields including trade, climate change, human rights, energy, refugee and security politics. Although empirical work on burgeoned, normative lagged behind. In this article, I explore whether hinders or promotes deliberative democracy. focus motivated response much-discussed global democratic deficit. undertake analysis by applying recent ‘systemic turn’ theory. Specifically, draw upon John Dryzek’s notion capacity assess provides space develop inclusive, authentic consequential deliberation. To gain traction argument, look at complex which governs intellectual property rights. addition assessment, also be...

参考文章(51)
Christopher May, The World Intellectual Property Organisation and the Development Agenda Global Society. ,vol. 22, pp. 97- 113 ,(2008) , 10.1080/13600820701740753
Michael Geist, ACTA's State of Play: Looking Beyond Transparency American University of International Law Review. ,vol. 26, pp. 1- ,(2011)
David S. Levine, David S. Levine, Transparency Soup: The ACTA Negotiating Process and ‘Black Box’ Lawmaking Social Science Research Network. ,(2011)
Stephen Elstub, The Third Generation of Deliberative Democracy Political Studies Review. ,vol. 8, pp. 291- 307 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1478-9302.2010.00216.X
Richard Falk, Andrew Strauss, Toward Global Parliament Foreign Affairs. ,vol. 80, pp. 212- ,(2001) , 10.2307/20050054
Thomas Risse, Arguing about arguing: a comment Critical Policy Studies. ,vol. 7, pp. 339- 349 ,(2013) , 10.1080/19460171.2013.831675
Hayley Stevenson, John S. Dryzek, The legitimacy of multilateral climate governance: a deliberative democratic approach Critical Policy Studies. ,vol. 6, pp. 1- 18 ,(2012) , 10.1080/19460171.2012.659879