Inbound open innovation for pharmaceutical markets: a case study of an anti-diabetic drug in-licensing decision

作者: Allan Ya-Huan Wu , Victoria Janine Little , Brian Low

DOI: 10.1108/JBIM-10-2013-0236

关键词: Open innovationMarketingMarketing managementPharmaceutical industryChoice setBusinessData qualityHeuristicsProcess (engineering)New product developmentBusiness and International Management

摘要: Purpose – This paper aims to increase understanding of how firms can more effectively identify valuable and profitable innovations in the pharmaceutical industry and to identify the issues and challenges posed by current managerial decision-making practices. Design/methodology/approach – A case study of a single project is presented: a drug in-licensing decision made by a team of three managers in a large Australian pharmaceutical firm. Using participant-observation, interviews and archival analysis, the authors followed the managers as they identified and evaluated 122 late-stage anti-diabetic drug variants for further development. Findings – The managers used decision heuristics to arrive at a short list of three drugs from a choice set of 122. While the process was ostensibly rational and systematic, there was evidence of data quality issues, misleading mental models and cognitive bias. The authors concluded a high probability of accepting a poor candidate or rejecting a stronger candidate (i.e. making Type I and II errors). Research limitations/implications – This paper focuses on initial market and technology evaluation stage only (i.e. not commercialization) and is a single case study design; therefore, care should be taken in generalizing to other decisions or other contexts. This paper highlights the need for further research integrating organizational decision-making and open innovation from a multi-disciplinary perspective. Practical/implications – This paper raises awareness of potential decision-making pitfalls and includes a detailed audit framework to support improved managerial decision processes and double rather than single loop learning. Social/implications – The findings support better decision-making and therefore supports higher quality drug selection and development, leading to improved population health outcomes. Originality/value – Multi-disciplinary, draws attention of marketing and new product development scholars to open innovation research. It adds to knowledge about open innovation practices at the project level. It also provides an extended model of market opportunity analysis for high technology markets.

参考文章(78)
Susan Mohammed, Richard Klimoski, Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor? Journal of Management. ,vol. 20, pp. 403- 437 ,(1994) , 10.1016/0149-2063(94)90021-3
M. M. Gabir, R. L. Hanson, D. Dabelea, G. Imperatore, J. Roumain, P. H. Bennett, W. C. Knowler, The 1997 American Diabetes Association and 1999 World Health Organization criteria for hyperglycemia in the diagnosis and prediction of diabetes. Diabetes Care. ,vol. 23, pp. 1108- 1112 ,(2000) , 10.2337/DIACARE.23.8.1108
Mark A. Moon, John T. Mentzer, Carlo D. Smith, Conducting a sales forecasting audit International Journal of Forecasting. ,vol. 19, pp. 5- 25 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0169-2070(02)00032-8
N. Mohan Reddy, Market Opportunity Analysis for Emerging Technologies Management Decision. ,vol. 28, ,(1990) , 10.1108/00251749010005286
Chris Argyris, Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly. ,vol. 21, pp. 363- ,(1976) , 10.2307/2391848
Arch G. Woodside, Wim G. Biemans, Modeling innovation, manufacturing, diffusion and adoption/rejection processes Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. ,vol. 20, pp. 380- 393 ,(2005) , 10.1108/08858620510628614
Lisa O'Malley, Vicky Story, Susan Hart, Relational resources and competences for radical product innovation Journal of Marketing Management. ,vol. 25, pp. 461- 481 ,(2009) , 10.1362/026725709X461803
George S. Day, Managing the market learning process Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. ,vol. 17, pp. 240- 252 ,(2002) , 10.1108/08858620210431651
Linus Dahlander, David M. Gann, How open is innovation? Research Policy. ,vol. 39, pp. 699- 709 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.RESPOL.2010.01.013