How do Twitter users react to TV broadcasts dedicated to vaccines in Italy?

作者: Francesco Gesualdo , Angelo D’Ambrosio , Eleonora Agricola , Luisa Russo , Ilaria Campagna

DOI: 10.1093/EURPUB/CKAA022

关键词: Logistic regressionActive listeningAdvertisingPsychologySocial mediaPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

摘要: Background Social media monitoring during TV broadcasts dedicated to vaccines can provide information on vaccine confidence. We analyzed the sentiment of tweets published in reaction to two TV broadcasts in Italy dedicated to vaccines, one based on scientific evidence [Presadiretta (PD)] and one including anti-vaccine personalities [Virus (VS)]. Methods Tweets about vaccines published in an 8-day period centred on each of the two TV broadcasts were classified by sentiment. Differences in tweets’ and users’ characteristics between the two broadcasts were tested through Poisson, quasi-Poisson or logistic univariate regression. We investigated the association between users’ characteristics and sentiment through univariate quasi-binomial logistic regression. Results We downloaded 12 180 tweets pertinent to vaccines, published by 5447 users; 276 users tweeted during both broadcasts. Sentiment was positive in 50.4% of tweets, negative in 37.7% and neutral in 10.1% (remaining tweets were unclear or questions). The positive/negative ratio was higher for VS compared to PD (6.96 vs. 4.24, P<0.001). Positive sentiment was associated to the user’s number of followers (OR 1.68, P<0.001), friends (OR 1.83, P<0.001) and published tweets (OR 1.46, P<0.001) and to being a recurrent user (OR 3.26, P<0.001). Conclusions Twitter users were highly reactive to TV broadcasts dedicated to vaccines. Sentiment was mainly positive, especially among very active users. Displaying anti-vaccine positions on TV elicited a positive sentiment on Twitter. Listening to social media during TV shows dedicated to vaccines can provide a diverse set of data that can be exploited by public health institutions to inform tailored vaccine communication initiatives.

参考文章(25)
Lluís Màrquez, Horacio Rodríguez, Part-of-speech tagging using decision trees Machine Learning: ECML-98. pp. 25- 36 ,(1998) , 10.1007/BFB0026668
Heidi J Larson, David MD Smith, Pauline Paterson, Melissa Cumming, Elisabeth Eckersberger, Clark C Freifeld, Isaac Ghinai, Caitlin Jarrett, Louisa Paushter, John S Brownstein, Lawrence C Madoff, Measuring vaccine confidence: analysis of data obtained by a media surveillance system used to analyse public concerns about vaccines Lancet Infectious Diseases. ,vol. 13, pp. 606- 613 ,(2013) , 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70108-7
Glen J. Nowak, Bruce G. Gellin, Noni E. MacDonald, Robb Butler, Addressing vaccine hesitancy: The potential value of commercial and social marketing principles and practices. Vaccine. ,vol. 33, pp. 4204- 4211 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.VACCINE.2015.04.039
Caitlin Jarrett, Rose Wilson, Maureen O’Leary, Elisabeth Eckersberger, Heidi J. Larson, Strategies for addressing vaccine hesitancy – A systematic review☆ Vaccine. ,vol. 33, pp. 4180- 4190 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.VACCINE.2015.04.040
Andrew Gelman, Aleks Jakulin, Maria Grazia Pittau, Yu-Sung Su, A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models The Annals of Applied Statistics. ,vol. 2, pp. 1360- 1383 ,(2008) , 10.1214/08-AOAS191
Trevor J. Hastie, John M. Chambers, Statistical Models in S ,(1991)
Albert C. Gunther, Stephanie Edgerly, Heather Akin, James A. Broesch, Partisan Evaluation of Partisan Information Communication Research. ,vol. 39, pp. 439- 457 ,(2012) , 10.1177/0093650212441794
Elizabeth Rasche González, TV report on DTP galvanizes US pediatricians JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. ,vol. 248, pp. 12- 22 ,(1982) , 10.1001/JAMA.1982.03330010004002
Jerome H. Friedman, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines Annals of Statistics. ,vol. 19, pp. 1- 141 ,(1991) , 10.1214/AOS/1176347963
David M. Erceg-Hurn, Lyndall G. Steed, Does exposure to cigarette health warnings elicit psychological reactance in smokers Journal of Applied Social Psychology. ,vol. 41, pp. 219- 237 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1559-1816.2010.00710.X