Enamel Surface Roughness of Preferred Debonding and Polishing Protocols
作者： Brian J. Webb , Jacob Koch , Joseph L. Hagan , Richard W. Ballard , Paul C. Armbruster
DOI: 10.1179/1465313315Y.0000000009
关键词: Buccal Surface 、 Adhesive 、 Premolar 、 Enamel paint 、 Polishing 、 Titanium carbide 、 Dentistry 、 Profilometer 、 Surface roughness 、 Materials science
摘要: Objective:: This study investigated the surface roughness of enamel after debonding and instrumentation with commonly used methods.Methods:: Part I: a survey was sent to active members American Association Orthodontists determine popular bonding, debonding, polishing protocols. II: brackets were bonded buccal 30 extracted human premolar teeth. After residual adhesive removed 12-, 16-, 20-fluted titanium carbide burs as based upon results. The teeth scanned profilometer for roughness. III: further polished using Reliance Renew point or prophy cup pumice rescanned roughness.Results:: majority respondents generic bracket-removing plier remove fixed appliances (53%) high-speed handpiece removal (85%). most bur 12-fluted without water spray. p...
sagepub.com
unirioja.es
sci-hub.se 参考文章(13)
Phillip M. Campbell, Enamel surfaces after orthodontic bracket debonding. Angle Orthodontist. ,vol. 65, pp. 103- 110 ,(1995) , 10.1043/0003-3219(1995)065<0103:ESAOBD>2.0.CO;2
Alev Cetinşahin, Neslihan Eminkahyagil, Ayca Arman, Erdem Karabulut, Effect of resin-removal methods on enamel and shear bond strength of rebonded brackets. Angle Orthodontist. ,vol. 76, pp. 314- 321 ,(2009) , 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0314:EORMOE]2.0.CO;2
Klara Kim, Kristin Heimisdottir, Urs Gebauer, G. Rutger Persson, Clinical and microbiological findings at sites treated with orthodontic fixed appliances in adolescents. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. ,vol. 137, pp. 223- 228 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.AJODO.2008.03.027
Bjørn U. Zachrisson, Jon Årthun, Enamel surface appearance after various debonding techniques American Journal of Orthodontics. ,vol. 75, pp. 121- 137 ,(1979) , 10.1016/0002-9416(79)90181-7
Ivar Caspersen, Residual acrylic adhesive after removal of plastic orthodontic brackets: A scanning electron microscopic study American Journal of Orthodontics. ,vol. 71, pp. 637- 650 ,(1977) , 10.1016/0002-9416(77)90280-9
Bertrand D. Rouleau, Grayson W. Marshall, Robert O. Cooley, Enamel surface evaluations after clinical treatment and removal of orthodontic brackets American Journal of Orthodontics. ,vol. 81, pp. 423- 426 ,(1982) , 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90081-1
Abbas R Zaher, Essam M Abdalla, Maha A Abdel Motie, Noman Atiq Rehman, Hassan Kassem, Athanasios E Athanasiou, Enamel colour changes after debonding using various bonding systems Journal of Orthodontics. ,vol. 39, pp. 82- 88 ,(2012) , 10.1179/1465312512Z.0000000009
Çaöry Ulusoy, Comparison of finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal after debonding Journal of Applied Oral Science. ,vol. 17, pp. 209- 215 ,(2009) , 10.1590/S1678-77572009000300015
S. Ryf, S. Flury, S. Palaniappan, A. Lussi, B. van Meerbeek, B. Zimmerli, Enamel loss and adhesive remnants following bracket removal and various clean-up procedures in vitro European Journal of Orthodontics. ,vol. 34, pp. 25- 32 ,(2012) , 10.1093/EJO/CJQ128
A. J. Ireland, I. Hosein, M. Sherriff, Enamel loss at bond-up, debond and clean-up following the use of a conventional light-cured composite and a resin-modified glass polyalkenoate cement European Journal of Orthodontics. ,vol. 27, pp. 413- 419 ,(2005) , 10.1093/EJO/CJI031