Moral Bioenhancement Probably Won’t Improve Things for Animals (and May Make Them Worse)

作者: Bob Fischer

DOI: 10.1007/S11245-017-9467-7

关键词: Social psychologyPhilosophy of scienceAltruism (ethics)PsychologyAnimal ethicsEnvironmental ethics

摘要: Persson and Savulescu are advocates for moral bioenhancement—i.e., using drug treatments genetic engineering to enhance our core dispositions. Among other things, they suggest that bioenhancement would improve how we treat animals. My goal here is argue have little reason think will help in this regard. What’s more, it may make things worse. This because (a) there cognitive mechanisms lead us discount animal interests relative human interests—mechanisms not overridden by increased altruism a stronger sense of justice—and (b) deep tensions between the humans animals well exacerbate.

参考文章(37)
INGMAR PERSSON, JULIAN SAVULESCU, GETTING MORAL ENHANCEMENT RIGHT: THE DESIRABILITY OF MORAL BIOENHANCEMENT Bioethics. ,vol. 27, pp. 124- 131 ,(2013) , 10.1111/J.1467-8519.2011.01907.X
ROBERT SPARROW, A Not-So-New Eugenics: Harris and Savulescu on Human Enhancement Hastings Center Report. ,vol. 41, pp. 32- 42 ,(2011) , 10.1002/J.1552-146X.2011.TB00098.X
Ingmar Persson, Julian Savulescu, Unfit for the Future? Human Nature, Scientific Progress, and the Need for Moral Enhancement Enhancing Human Capacities. pp. 486- 500 ,(2014) , 10.1002/9781444393552.CH35
Julian Savulescu, Ingmar Persson, Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement ,(2012)
JOHN HARRIS, Moral enhancement and freedom. Bioethics. ,vol. 25, pp. 102- 111 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1467-8519.2010.01854.X
INGMAR PERSSON, JULIAN SAVULESCU, The perils of cognitive enhancement and the urgent imperative to enhance the moral character of humanity Journal of Applied Philosophy. ,vol. 25, pp. 162- 177 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1468-5930.2008.00410.X
Brooke Dixon Preylo, Hiroko Arikawa, Comparison of Vegetarians and Non-Vegetarians on Pet Attitude and Empathy Anthrozoos. ,vol. 21, pp. 387- 395 ,(2008) , 10.2752/175303708X371654