Progesterone Receptor Modulator for Emergency Contraception A Randomized Controlled Trial

作者: Mitchell D. Creinin , William Schlaff , David F. Archer , Livia Wan , Ron Frezieres

DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000239440.02284.45

关键词: MedicinePregnancyConfidence intervalObstetricsLevonorgestrelPregnancy rateGynecologyUlipristal acetateEmergency contraceptionAdverse effectRandomized controlled trial

摘要: OBJECTIVE: Compare the efficacy and adverse effects of CDB-2914, a new progesterone receptor modulator, to levonorgestrel for emergency contraception. METHODS: We performed randomized, doubleblinded noninferiority trial, enrolling healthy women seeking contraception within 72 hours unprotected intercourse. Participants were randomly assigned receive single dose 50 mg plus placebo 12 later or two doses 0.75 taken apart. Follow-up was scheduled 5 7 days after expected onset next menstrual period. Posttreatment pregnancy established by positive urine test at follow-up confirmed quantitative serum -hCG. Daily diaries used from time use until menses record sexual activity. RESULTS: Product evaluable in 775 CDB2914 users 774 users. Pregnancies occurred (0.9%, 95% confidence interval 0.2–1.6%) 13 (1.7%, 0.8–2.6%) women, respectively. Based on estimated cycle day intercourse, 85% 69% anticipated pregnancies, respectively, averted. Nausea reported somewhat greater percentage CDB-2914 than (29% compared with 24%, P.03), but distribution other similar both groups. Women groups experienced considerable variation length as their individual normal lengths. CONCLUSION: is least effective preventing pregnancies intercourse has side effect profile. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www. clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00271583 (Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:1089–97) LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I

参考文章(24)
James Trussell, Felicia Stewart, Felicia Guest, Robert A. Hatcher, Emergency Contraceptive Pills: A Simple Proposal to Reduce Unintended Pregnancies Family Planning Perspectives. ,vol. 24, pp. 269- 273 ,(1992) , 10.2307/2135857
Jie Shen, Yan Che, Emily Showell, Ke Chen, Linan Cheng, Interventions for emergency contraception Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 8, pp. 0- 0 ,(2017) , 10.1002/14651858.CD001324.PUB5
Garrett W. Dixon, Ethinyl Estradiol and Conjugated Estrogens as Postcoital Contraceptives JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. ,vol. 244, pp. 1336- 1339 ,(1980) , 10.1001/JAMA.1980.03310120024016
William C. Blackwelder, “Proving the null hypothesis” in clinical trials Controlled Clinical Trials. ,vol. 3, pp. 345- 353 ,(1981) , 10.1016/0197-2456(82)90024-1
James Trussell, Germán Rodrı́guez, Charlotte Ellertson, New estimates of the effectiveness of the Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception Contraception. ,vol. 57, pp. 363- 369 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0010-7824(98)00042-0
Pamela Stratton, Beth Hartog, Negin Hajizadeh, Johann Piquion, Dorett Sutherland, Maria Merino, Young Jack Lee, Lynnette K Nieman, A single mid-follicular dose of CDB-2914, a new antiprogestin, inhibits folliculogenesis and endometrial differentiation in normally cycling women Human Reproduction. ,vol. 15, pp. 1092- 1099 ,(2000) , 10.1093/HUMREP/15.5.1092
John J. Bartko, Proving the null hypothesis. American Psychologist. ,vol. 46, pp. 1089- 1089 ,(1991) , 10.1037/0003-066X.46.10.1089.A
Allen J. Wilcox, David B. Dunson, Clarice R. Weinberg, James Trussell, Donna Day Baird, Likelihood of conception with a single act of intercourse: providing benchmark rates for assessment of post-coital contraceptives Contraception. ,vol. 63, pp. 211- 215 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0010-7824(01)00191-3