作者: David M. McEvoy , John K. Stranlund
DOI: 10.1007/S10640-008-9220-1
关键词: Environmental quality 、 Business 、 Cooperative Agreements 、 Compliance (psychology) 、 Audit 、 Environmental economics 、 Public economics 、 Welfare 、 Economics and Econometrics 、 Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 、 Aerospace engineering
摘要: Theoretical analyses of international environmental agreements (IEAs) have often employed the concept self-enforcing to predict number parties such an agreement. The term self-enforcing, however, is a bit misleading. refers stability cooperative agreements, not enforcing compliance with these once they are in place. In this paper we analyze IEA game which agreement finance independent monitor who audits performance members These reveal instances noncompliance so can be sanctioned. We find that costly monitoring limits circumstances under cooperation protect environment worthwhile, but when IEAs do form will involve greater participation than require monitoring. Consequently, produce higher quality. Moreover, certain conditions, aggregate welfare