Ecosystem Services as a Contested Concept: a Synthesis of Critique and Counter-Arguments

作者: Matthias Schröter , Emma H. van der Zanden , Alexander P.E. van Oudenhoven , Roy P. Remme , Rudolf S. Serna-Chavez

DOI: 10.1111/CONL.12091

关键词: AnthropocentrismSociologyPhilosophy of scienceEcosystem servicesNormativeBoundary objectEnvironmental ethicsEcologyCommodification of natureVaguenessValuation (finance)

摘要: We describe and reflect on seven recurring critiques of the concept ecosystem services respective counter-arguments. First, is criticized for being anthropocentric, whereas others argue that it goes beyond instrumental values. Second, some promotes an exploitative human-nature relationship, state reconnects society to ecosystems, emphasizing humanity's dependence nature. Third, concerns exist may conflict with biodiversity conservation objectives, emphasize complementarity. Fourth, questioned because its supposed focus economic valuation, science includes many Fifth, promoting commodification nature, point out most are not connected market-based instruments. Sixth, vagueness definitions classifications stated be a weakness, enhances transdisciplinary collaboration. Seventh, criticize normative nature concept, implying all outcomes processes desirable. The indeed typical but should problematic when acknowledged. By disentangling contrasting different arguments we hope contribute more structured debate between opponents proponents concept.

参考文章(67)
SUSANNE MENZEL, JACK TENG, Ecosystem Services as a Stakeholder‐Driven Concept for Conservation Science Conservation Biology. ,vol. 24, pp. 907- 909 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2009.01347.X
Kent H Redford, William M Adams, Payment for Ecosystem Services and the Challenge of Saving Nature Conservation Biology. ,vol. 23, pp. 785- 787 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2009.01271.X
Sven Wunder, When payments for environmental services will work for conservation Conservation Letters. ,vol. 6, pp. 230- 237 ,(2013) , 10.1111/CONL.12034
R. Haines-Young, I. Ring, B. Fisher, J. Gowdy, J. Aronson, M. Christie, R.S. de Groot, S. Polasky, R. Portela, A. Neuville, L. Braat, E. Maltby, Integrating the ecological and economic dimensions in biodiversity and ecosystem service valuation The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB): Ecological and Economic Foundations. pp. 9- 40 ,(2010) , 10.4324/9781849775489
Morgan Robertson, Measurement and alienation: making a world of ecosystem services Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. ,vol. 37, pp. 386- 401 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1475-5661.2011.00476.X
David Laws, Maarten Hajer, Policy in Practice Oxford Handbooks Online. ,(2008) , 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199548453.003.0019
Bhaskar Vira, William M. Adams, Ecosystem services and conservation strategy: beware the silver bullet Conservation Letters. ,vol. 2, pp. 158- 162 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2009.00063.X
Ben Ridder, Questioning the ecosystem services argument for biodiversity conservation Biodiversity and Conservation. ,vol. 17, pp. 781- 790 ,(2008) , 10.1007/S10531-008-9316-5
Silvio O. Funtowicz, Jerome R. Ravetz, Science for the post-normal age Futures. ,vol. 25, pp. 739- 755 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L
James Justus, Mark Colyvan, Helen Regan, Lynn Maguire, Buying into conservation: intrinsic versus instrumental value Trends in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 24, pp. 187- 191 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.TREE.2008.11.011