作者: Michael Lawrence Elliott
DOI: 10.1016/S0195-9255(81)80019-4
关键词: Environmental impact assessment 、 Task (project management) 、 Decision maker 、 Engineering 、 Environmental protection 、 Environmental economics 、 Variety (cybernetics) 、 Ecology (disciplines) 、 Geography, Planning and Development 、 Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
摘要: It may seem counter intui t ive , but the more effectively envi ronmenta l impacts are specified, difficult problem of choos ing a m o n g project or policy opt ions becomes. Impact specification, if done well, should cause decision makers to consider tradeoffs they had not previously considered. T h e enumerated in an environmenta assessment, richer array tradeoffs. The obvious tradeoffs, complex tile task evaluation. facilitate evaluat ion maker, environmental analysts have exper imented with wide variety ronmental impact s tatement (EIS) presentat techniques. tradit ional technique O f is all potential little use either publ ic interest groups. Many analysts, therefore, tempted meet format needs EIS reader by summar iz and directly compa r based on significance impacts. In absence scientific polit ical consensus about what constitutes desirable ronment found this p u i ece rather difficult. Scientifically, many qual i-