Are rural older drivers subject to low-mileage bias?

作者: Trevor R. Hanson , Eric D. Hildebrand

DOI: 10.1016/J.AAP.2011.04.028

关键词: Poison controlOccupational safety and healthContext (language use)Injury preventionHuman factors and ergonomicsRural areaComputer securityGeographySuicide preventionDemographyCollision

摘要: Abstract Comparing exposure-based collision statistics between older drivers based on age alone erroneously assumes a linear relationship exposure and frequency. Research has suggested that low-mileage drivers, of any age, tend to have higher rates because the majority their travel is typically congested city streets with potential for collisions, referred as “low-mileage bias”. It unclear whether it appropriate extend this perspective rural where could be expected they would likely very different habits than an urban driver equivalent annual mileage. Consequently, reliance “low-mileage-bias” explanation high among seniors benefit from distinction differences in type driving drivers. This paper used detailed information obtained Global Positioning System (GPS) supported diary study explore bias” exists Revealed behaviour GPS diaries convenience sample 60 aged 54–92 years showed proportion increased self-reported mileage decreased age. finding contrary previous results no was made These results, combined research showing oldest (81 older) counterparts, suggests may not exist context. possible risk understated, but further required. Self-reported groups are useful way organize analyze information, group analysis should excluded.

参考文章(12)
S Koppel, J Langford, A tale of two surveys: explaining older drivers' low mileage bias Australasian Road Safety Research Policing Education Conference, 2005, Wellington, New Zealand. ,(2005)
John D. Edwards, Transportation planning handbook Institute of Transportation Engineers. ,(1999)
Liisa Hakamies-Blomqvist, Tarjaliisa Raitanen, Desmond O’Neill, Driver ageing does not cause higher accident rates per km Transportation Research Part F-traffic Psychology and Behaviour. ,vol. 5, pp. 271- 274 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S1369-8478(03)00005-6
Rune Elvik, Alena Erke, Peter Christensen, Elementary Units of Exposure Transportation Research Record. ,vol. 2103, pp. 25- 31 ,(2009) , 10.3141/2103-04
Loraine Blaxter, How to Research ,(1996)
Loren Staplin, Kenneth W. Gish, John Joyce, 'Low mileage bias' and related policy implications--A cautionary note Accident Analysis & Prevention. ,vol. 40, pp. 1249- 1252 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.AAP.2007.10.012
Jim Langford, Sjaanie Koppel, Dennis McCarthy, Sivaramakrishnan Srinivasan, In defence of the 'low-mileage bias'. Accident Analysis & Prevention. ,vol. 40, pp. 1996- 1999 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.AAP.2008.08.027
Mary K. Janke, Accidents, mileage, and the exaggeration of risk. Accident Analysis & Prevention. ,vol. 23, pp. 183- 188 ,(1991) , 10.1016/0001-4575(91)90048-A
Young-Jun Kweon, Kara M. Kockelman, Overall injury risk to different drivers: combining exposure, frequency, and severity models Accident Analysis & Prevention. ,vol. 35, pp. 441- 450 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00021-0
Michael D. Keall, William J. Frith, Characteristics and Risks of Drivers with Low Annual Distance Driven Traffic Injury Prevention. ,vol. 7, pp. 248- 255 ,(2006) , 10.1080/15389580600672836