作者: John M. Quigley
DOI: 10.1016/0166-0462(86)90011-6
关键词: Investment (macroeconomics) 、 Investment decisions 、 Hedonic pricing 、 Economics 、 Microeconomics 、 Willingness to pay 、 Urban policy 、 Subsidy
摘要: Abstract This paper considers the evaluation of urban renewal and other investment policies application aggregate willingness to pay criterion decisions. Two rigorous approaches measurement program benefits are examined. The two methods, ‘hedonic pricing’ ‘quantal choice’, compared by relying on a series simulations.