Source profiles for industrial, mobile, and area sources in the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational study.
作者： Steven D. Kohl , Johann P. Engelbrecht , Mark C. Green , Judith C. Chow , John G. Watson
DOI: 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2003.07.004
关键词: Kiln 、 Chemical composition 、 Combustion 、 Air quality index 、 Carbon 、 Oil refinery 、 Air pollution 、 Environmental science 、 Aerosol 、 Mineralogy
摘要: Representative PM2.5 and PM10 source emissions were sampled in Texas during the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility Observa (BRAVO) study. Chemical profiles for elements, ions, carbon fractions of 145 samples are reported paved unpaved road dust, soil motor vehicle exhaust, vegetative burning, four coal-fired power stations, an oil refinery catalytic cracker, two cement kilns, residential meat cooking. Several taken from each emitter type, these averaged by subgroups based on commonality chemical composition. The standard deviation represents variability mass fractions. BRAVO differed some respects measured elsewhere. High calcium abundances geological high selenium antimony cracker found. Abundances eight thermally evolved [Atmos. Environ. 28 (15) (1994) 2493] differ among combustion sources, a Monte Carlo simulation demonstrates that differences sufficient to differentiate several carbon-emitters.
harvard.edu
elsevier.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(30)
Marsha Creatchman, Sheldon Landsberger, Elemental analysis of airborne particles Gordon and Breach Science Publishers. ,(1999)
William Horwitz, Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International AOAC official method 985.29. ,(2006)
Philip K. Hopke, Receptor modeling for air quality management Elsevier, 1991. pp. 95- 118 ,(1997) , 10.1039/9781847550101-00095
James E. Houck, Chapter 3 - Source Sampling for Receptor Modeling Data Handling in Science and Technology. ,vol. 7, pp. 45- 82 ,(1991) , 10.1016/S0922-3487(08)70126-6
L. M. Hildemann, G. R. Cass, G. R. Markowski, A Dilution Stack Sampler for Collection of Organic Aerosol Emissions: Design, Characterization and Field Tests Aerosol Science and Technology. ,vol. 10, pp. 193- 204 ,(1989) , 10.1080/02786828908959234
Glen E. Gordon, William R. Pierson, Joan M. Daisey, Paul J. Lioy, John A. Cooper, John G. Watson, Glen R. Cass, Considerations for design of source apportionment studies Atmospheric Environment. ,vol. 18, pp. 1567- 1582 ,(1984) , 10.1016/0004-6981(84)90379-2
Judith C. Chow, John G. Watson, Review of PM2.5 and PM10 Apportionment for Fossil Fuel Combustion and Other Sources by the Chemical Mass Balance Receptor Model Energy & Fuels. ,vol. 16, pp. 222- 260 ,(2002) , 10.1021/EF0101715
Douglas H. Lowenthal, Thomas Merrifield, Judith C. Chow, John G. Watson, Dale Crow, Comparison of IMPROVE and NIOSH Carbon Measurements Aerosol Science and Technology. ,vol. 34, pp. 23- 34 ,(2001) , 10.1080/02786820119073
James J. Schauer, Glen R. Cass, Source Apportionment of Wintertime Gas-Phase and Particle-Phase Air Pollutants Using Organic Compounds as Tracers Environmental Science & Technology. ,vol. 34, pp. 1821- 1832 ,(2000) , 10.1021/ES981312T
Judith C. Chow, Introduction to the A&WMA 2002 Critical Review Visibility: Science and Regulation. Journal of The Air & Waste Management Association. ,vol. 52, pp. 626- 627 ,(2002) , 10.1080/10473289.2002.10470812