Pitfalls in Practical Open Multi Agent Argumentation Systems: Malicious Argumentation

作者: Jörg Denzinger , Andrew Kuipers

DOI:

关键词: Action (philosophy)Communications protocolArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceArgumentation theoryArgumentComputer securityGeneral problemOrder (exchange)Outcome (game theory)Multi-agent system

摘要: When an interaction mechanism such as argumentation is considered for use in open multi agent domains, E-Commerce or other business applications, it necessary to consider the possibility of agents performing malicious actions. Common themes when studying actions communication protocols are that withholding information and misrepresenting information. In argumentation, however, a complex underlying formal logic allows another type action: introduction superfluous complexity into information, designed overwhelm reasoning capacity agent. We examine strategy systems based on exploiting order manipulate outcome argument acceptability evaluation. Further, we briefly discuss general problem defensive strategies against this inherent difficulty detecting occurrences it.

参考文章(14)
Jörg Denzinger, Matthias Fuchs, A Comparison of Equality Reasoning Heuristics Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 361- 382 ,(1998) , 10.1007/978-94-017-0435-9_13
Phan Minh Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning and logic programming international joint conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 852- 857 ,(1993)
Iyad Rahwan, Kate Larson, Mechanism design for abstract argumentation adaptive agents and multi-agents systems. pp. 1031- 1038 ,(2008) , 10.5555/1402298.1402365
Luís Brito, José Neves, None, Properties and Complexity in Feasible Logic-Based Argumentation for Electronic Commerce ibero american conference on ai. pp. 90- 100 ,(2002) , 10.1007/3-540-36131-6_10
Roger Wattenhofer, Stefan Schmid, Thomas Locher, Patrick Moor, Free Riding in BitTorrent is Cheap. HotNets. ,(2006)
Anthony Hunter, Philippe Besnard, Practical first-order argumentation national conference on artificial intelligence. pp. 590- 595 ,(2005)
Paul E. Dunne, Prevarication in dispute protocols international conference on artificial intelligence and law. pp. 12- 21 ,(2003) , 10.1145/1047788.1047791
Ronald P. Loui, Process and Policy: Resource-Bounded NonDemonstrative Reasoning computational intelligence. ,vol. 14, pp. 1- 38 ,(1998) , 10.1111/0824-7935.00055
Luís Brito, José Neves, None, Argument exchange in heterogeneous electronic commerce environments Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems part 1 - AAMAS '02. pp. 410- 417 ,(2002) , 10.1145/544741.544837
Eduardo Alonso, Rights and Argumentation in Open Multi-Agent Systems Artificial Intelligence Review. ,vol. 21, pp. 3- 24 ,(2004) , 10.1023/B:AIRE.0000007389.67810.17