Go-Lab learning spaces specification
作者： Evita Tasiopoulou , Margus Pedaste , Siswa van Riesen , Nikoletta Xenofontos , Külli Kori
DOI:
关键词: Software engineering 、 Deliverable 、 Computer science 、 Interface (Java) 、 Relation (database) 、 Set (psychology) 、 Process (engineering)
摘要: The current deliverable presents a set of initial specifications the Go-Lab learning spaces, which is interface that students see and use when with online lab. These are based on an overview literature cycles in inquiry guidance can be given to involved process labs. organized as follows: We start summarizing main goals for laboratories. Then we summarize different synthesize cycle best fits project. Next, review labs given. organize this according types support phases selected cycle. inventories choices then result spaces illustrated three anchor chose phase project: Aquarium, Faulkes Telescopes, HYPATIA. should read relation full versions mock-ups environments.
utwente.nl参考文章(154)
Arthur C. Graesser, Jennifer Wiley, Susan R. Goldman, Tenaha O’Reilly, Moongee Jeon, Bethany McDaniel, SEEK Web tutor: fostering a critical stance while exploring the causes of volcanic eruption Metacognition and Learning. ,vol. 2, pp. 89- 105 ,(2007) , 10.1007/S11409-007-9013-X
Koen Veermans, Wouter van Joolingen, Ton de Jong, Use of Heuristics to Facilitate Scientific Discovery Learning in a Simulation Learning Environment in a Physics Domain International Journal of Science Education. ,vol. 28, pp. 341- 361 ,(2006) , 10.1080/09500690500277615
Daphne D. Minner, Abigail Jurist Levy, Jeanne Century, Inquiry-based science instruction-what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002 Journal of Research in Science Teaching. ,vol. 47, pp. 474- 496 ,(2010) , 10.1002/TEA.20347
Ton de Jong, Ernesto Martin, Jose-Miguel Zamarro, Francisco Esquembre, Janine Swaak, Wouter R. van Joolingen, The Integration of Computer Simulation and Learning Support: An Example from the Physics Domain of Collisions Journal of Research in Science Teaching. ,vol. 36, pp. 597- 615 ,(1999) , 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199905)36:5<597::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-6
Georgios Olympiou, Zacharias C. Zacharia, Blending Physical and Virtual Manipulatives: An Effort to Improve Students' Conceptual Understanding through Science Laboratory Experimentation Science Education. ,vol. 96, pp. 21- 47 ,(2012) , 10.1002/SCE.20463
Mary M. Bevevino, Joan Dengel, Kenneth Adams, Constructivist Theory in the Classroom Internalizing: Concepts through Inquiry Learning The Clearing House. ,vol. 72, pp. 275- 278 ,(1999) , 10.1080/00098659909599406
Kevin W. McElhaney, Marcia C. Linn, Investigations of a complex, realistic task: Intentional, unsystematic, and exhaustive experimenters Journal of Research in Science Teaching. ,vol. 48, pp. 745- 770 ,(2011) , 10.1002/TEA.20423
B. Balamuralithara, P. C. Woods, Virtual laboratories in engineering education: The simulation lab and remote lab Computer Applications in Engineering Education. ,vol. 17, pp. 108- 118 ,(2009) , 10.1002/CAE.20186
Jill A. Marshall, Erica Slate Young, Preservice teachers' theory development in physical and simulated environments Journal of Research in Science Teaching. ,vol. 43, pp. 907- 937 ,(2006) , 10.1002/TEA.20124
Michael A. Sao Pedro, Ryan S. J. de Baker, Janice D. Gobert, Orlando Montalvo, Adam Nakama, Leveraging machine-learned detectors of systematic inquiry behavior to estimate and predict transfer of inquiry skill User Modeling and User-adapted Interaction. ,vol. 23, pp. 1- 39 ,(2013) , 10.1007/S11257-011-9101-0