Evaluating the quality of hydraulic conductivity estimates from piezometer slug tests in peat

作者: Ben W. J. Surridge , Andrew J. Baird , A. L. Heathwaite

DOI: 10.1002/HYP.5653

关键词: PiezometerHydraulic conductivityRepeat testingGeotechnical engineeringEnvironmental scienceTest proceduresSlug testPeatRange (statistics)Slug

摘要: Although widely used in wetland hydrological studies, hydraulic conductivity (K) estimates from piezometer slug tests are often of questionable validity. Frequently, this is because insufficient attention paid to the details test procedure. Further, a potentially heterogeneous and anisotropic medium such as peat, use prone error. In paper we address some methodological issues surrounding peat. We compare data with laboratory determinations vertical horizontal K obtained using new method. Piezometers were installed at three depths floodplain fen peat Norfolk, UK. Slug initiated by both insertion withdrawal, repeat conducted examine robustness our estimates. Most displayed departures log-linear model Hvorslev, form departure being consistent compressible soil behaviour. The results suggest that gave similar those withdrawal. Repeat testing showed withdrawal data, particular, highly reproducible normalized responses independent initial head. Values for estimated range 1 × 10−4 1·6 10−3 cm s−1, which towards upper end reported peats generally. Laboratory yielded values tests. was anisotropic, generated proved relatively good K.

参考文章(30)
Jr., James Johnson Butler, The design, performance, and analysis of slug tests CRC Press. ,(1997) , 10.1201/9781482229370
Andrew J. Baird, Simon W. Gaffney, Cylindrical Piezometer Responses in a Humified Fen Peat Hydrology Research. ,vol. 25, pp. 167- 182 ,(1994) , 10.2166/NH.1994.0002
Donald O. Rosenberry, Paul H. Glaser, Donald I. Siegel, Edwin P. Weeks, Use of hydraulic head to estimate volumetric gas content and ebullition flux in northern peatlands Water Resources Research. ,vol. 39, pp. 1066- ,(2003) , 10.1029/2002WR001377
James J. Butler, John M. Healey, Relationship Between Pumping-Test and Slug-Test Parameters: Scale Effect or Artifact? Ground Water. ,vol. 36, pp. 305- 312 ,(1998) , 10.1111/J.1745-6584.1998.TB01096.X
K. J. DEVITO, J. M. WADDINGTON, B. A. BRANFIREUN, FLOW REVERSALS IN PEATLANDS INFLUENCED BY LOCAL GROUNDWATER SYSTEMS Hydrological Processes. ,vol. 11, pp. 103- 110 ,(1997) , 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199701)11:1<103::AID-HYP417>3.0.CO;2-E
C.D. McElwee, Improving the analysis of slug tests Journal of Hydrology. ,vol. 269, pp. 122- 133 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00214-7
James J. Butler, Carl D. McElwee, Wenzhi Liu, Improving the quality of parameter estimates obtained from slug tests Ground Water. ,vol. 34, pp. 480- 490 ,(1996) , 10.1111/J.1745-6584.1996.TB02029.X
Hyejoung Seo, Jonggeun Choe, Numerical simulations for effects of anisotropy and heterogeneity on well responses to slug tests Environmental Earth Sciences. ,vol. 40, pp. 1066- 1074 ,(2001) , 10.1007/S002540100265
Susanne M. Schlotzhauer, Jonathan S. Price, Soil water flow dynamics in a managed cutover peat field, Quebec: Field and laboratory investigations Water Resources Research. ,vol. 35, pp. 3675- 3683 ,(1999) , 10.1029/1999WR900126
Clive W. Beckwith, Andrew J. Baird, Effect of biogenic gas bubbles on water flow through poorly decomposed blanket peat Water Resources Research. ,vol. 37, pp. 551- 558 ,(2001) , 10.1029/2000WR900303