Explaining the Rise in U.S. Antidumping Activity

作者: Douglas A. Irwin , Mike Finger , Bruce Blonigen

DOI:

关键词: International economicsPolitical scienceTreasuryCentennialLegislationExchange rate

摘要: Recent empirical studies of U.S. antidumping activity focus almost exclusively on the period since 1980. This paper puts this recent experience in historical context by examining determinants filings over past half century. The conventional view that few cases existed prior to 1980 is not correct, although most did result imposition duties. rise related increase import penetration (closely decline average rate protection) and shift authority from Treasury Commerce Department Exchange fluctuations also influence number filed any given year. was prepared for a symposium marking centennial legislation, held at University Michigan March 12, 2004. I thank Bruce Blonigen, Mike Finger, participants Dartmouth International Lunch helpful comments advice.

参考文章(14)
Joseph E. Pattison, Antidumping and countervailing duty laws C. Boardman Co.. ,(1984)
Douglas R. Nelson, H. Keith Hall, J. M. Finger, The political economy of administered protection The American Economic Review. ,vol. 72, pp. 452- 466 ,(1981)
A. Colin Cameron, Pravin K. Trivedi, Regression Analysis of Count Data ,(1998)
Robert M. Feinberg, Exchange Rates and "Unfair Trade" The Review of Economics and Statistics. ,vol. 71, pp. 704- 707 ,(1989) , 10.2307/1928116
Ronald D. Fischer, Thomas J. Prusa, WTO Exceptions as Insurance Review of International Economics. ,vol. 11, pp. 745- 757 ,(2003) , 10.1046/J.1467-9396.2003.00415.X
J. Michael Finger, The origins and evolution of antidumping regulation Research Papers in Economics. pp. 1- ,(1991)
Nellie T. Artis, J. M. Finger, Antidumping: How It Works and Who Gets Hurt ,(1993)
Anne O. Krueger, The WTO as an International Organization Research Papers in Economics. ,(1998)
Strom Thurmond, Reorganization Plan No. 2 ,(1950)