Repeat Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Secondary Grafts with Early Intervention Are Comparable with Fellow-Eye Primary Grafts

作者: Matthew T. Feng , Yuri McKee , Francis W. Price , Marianne O. Price

DOI: 10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2015.04.037

关键词: Intraocular pressureVisual acuitySurgeryTrabeculectomyDistance visual acuityOphthalmologyCorneal DecompensationIn patientMedicineDecompensationDescemet membrane

摘要: Purpose To evaluate the outcomes of secondary Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) after failed primary DMEK. Design Retrospective, interventional case series. Participants Fifty-five DMEK recipients 42 to 89 years age. Methods An initial consecutive series 1655 surgeries was reviewed identify cases (n = 55). A paired fellow-eye analysis performed with a subgroup 29 patients who underwent in 1 eye and successful fellow eye. Main Outcome Measures Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), central corneal thickness, 1-year cell loss. Results The median follow-up regraft 18 months (range, 3–61 months). All 55 regrafts cleared, 8 (15%) had air reinjected promote attachment, (2%) trabeculectomy progressive synechiae demonstrated late failure, no rejection episodes occurred (0%). In analysis, duration decompensation before 21 days 2–133 days). At 1, 3, 6, or 12 months, CDVA did not differ between grafts eyes (mean difference, ≤2 Snellen letters; P > 0.05 at all examinations). year, ≥20/20 61%, ≥20/25 81%, ≥20/40 100% excluding retinal problems. Vision differed by ≤1 line but patient longest time (133 days), haze irregular astigmatism from anterior stromal scarring during that period. associated 20/40 versus 20/20 for graft. thickness comparable difference 2 μm;  = 0.57). loss (27% vs. 31%, respectively; 0.58). Conclusions received prompt intervention minimize decompensation, matched

参考文章(28)
Sunita Chaurasia, Francis W. Price, Lauren Gunderson, Marianne O. Price, Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Clinical Results of Single Versus Triple Procedures (Combined with Cataract Surgery) Ophthalmology. ,vol. 121, pp. 454- 458 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2013.09.032
Lisanne Ham, Visual Rehabilitation Rate After Isolated Descemet Membrane Transplantation Archives of Ophthalmology. ,vol. 127, pp. 252- 255 ,(2009) , 10.1001/ARCHOPHTHALMOL.2008.619
Marianne O. Price, Francis W. Price, Friedrich E. Kruse, Bjöern O. Bachmann, Theofilos Tourtas, Randomized comparison of topical prednisolone acetate 1% versus fluorometholone 0.1% in the first year after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. ,vol. 33, pp. 880- 886 ,(2014) , 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000206
Sanjay V. Patel, Keith H. Baratz, Leo J. Maguire, David O. Hodge, Jay W. McLaren, Anterior Corneal Aberrations after Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy Ophthalmology. ,vol. 119, pp. 1522- 1529 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2012.01.038
Coster DJ, Australian Corneal Graft Registry Contributors Lowe MT, Keane MC, Williams KA, None, A Comparison of Lamellar and Penetrating Keratoplasty Outcomes: A Registry Study Ophthalmology. ,vol. 121, pp. 979- 987 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2013.12.017
Martin Dirisamer, Ru-Yin Yeh, Korine van Dijk, Lisanne Ham, Isabel Dapena, Gerrit R.J. Melles, Recipient endothelium may relate to corneal clearance in descemet membrane endothelial transfer. American Journal of Ophthalmology. ,vol. 154, pp. 290- 296 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.AJO.2012.02.032
Marianne O. Price, Kelly M. Fairchild, Francis W. Price, Comparison of manual and automated endothelial cell density analysis in normal eyes and DSEK eyes Cornea. ,vol. 32, pp. 567- 573 ,(2013) , 10.1097/ICO.0B013E31825DE8FA
Theofilos Tourtas, Kathrin Laaser, Bjoern O. Bachmann, Claus Cursiefen, Friedrich E. Kruse, Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty American Journal of Ophthalmology. ,vol. 153, pp. 1082- 1090 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.AJO.2011.12.012