Doing what's right: A grounded theory of ethical decision-making in occupational therapy.

作者: Sandra VanderKaay , Lori Letts , Bonny Jung , Sandra E. Moll

DOI: 10.1080/11038128.2018.1464060

关键词: Qualitative researchGrounded theoryOccupational therapyPsychologySystematic processEthical decisionApplied psychologyConstruct (philosophy)Theoretical samplingContext (language use)

摘要: Background: Ethical decision-making is an important aspect of reasoning in occupational therapy practice. However, the process ethical within broader context yet to be clearly explicated.Objective: The purpose this study was advance a theoretical understanding by which therapists make decisions day-to-day practice.Method: A constructivist grounded theory approach adopted, incorporating in-depth semi-structured interviews with 18 from range practice settings and years experience. Initially, participants nominated as key informants who were able reflect on their processes recruited. Theoretical sampling informed subsequent stages data collection. Participants asked describe using scenarios clinical Interview transcripts analyzed systematic initial then focused coding, categorization construct regarding decision-making.Findings: An prism developed capture three main processes: Considering Fundamental Checklist, Consulting Others, Doing What's Right. appeared inductive dialectical therapist at its core.Conclusion: Study findings our

参考文章(43)
Minette Drumwright, Robert Prentice, Cara Biasucci, Behavioral Ethics and Teaching Ethical Decision Making Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education. ,vol. 13, pp. 431- 458 ,(2015) , 10.1111/DSJI.12071
Valerie Wright-St Clair, Caring: The moral motivation for good occupational therapy practice Australian Occupational Therapy Journal. ,vol. 48, pp. 187- 199 ,(2001) , 10.1046/J.0045-0766.2001.00274.X
Robin Smith, Aristotle on the uses of dialectic Synthese. ,vol. 96, pp. 335- 358 ,(1993) , 10.1007/BF01064006
Mark D. Rogerson, Michael C. Gottlieb, Mitchell M. Handelsman, Samuel Knapp, Jeffrey Younggren, Nonrational processes in ethical decision making. American Psychologist. ,vol. 66, pp. 614- 623 ,(2011) , 10.1037/A0025215
Valerie A. Wright-St Clair, Diane B. Newcombe, Values and ethics in practice-based decision making: Les valeurs et l’éthique lors des prises de décision dans la pratique Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. ,vol. 81, pp. 154- 162 ,(2014) , 10.1177/0008417414535083
Anne Hudon, Maude Laliberté, Matthew Hunt, Vickie Sonier, Bryn Williams-Jones, Barbara Mazer, Valérie Badro, Debbie Ehrmann Feldman, What place for ethics? An overview of ethics teaching in occupational therapy and physiotherapy programs in Canada. Disability and Rehabilitation. ,vol. 36, pp. 775- 780 ,(2014) , 10.3109/09638288.2013.813082
Marie-Josée Drolet, The axiological ontology of occupational therapy: A philosophical analysis Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy. ,vol. 21, pp. 2- 10 ,(2013) , 10.3109/11038128.2013.831118