Eye lens monitoring for interventional radiology personnel: dosemeters, calibration and practical aspects of H-p(3) monitoring. A 2015 review

作者: Eleftheria Carinou , Paolo Ferrari , Olivera Ciraj Bjelac , Merce Gingaume , Marta Sans Merce

DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/35/3/R17

关键词: CalibrationEquivalent doseOptometryDose profileRadiation monitoringOpticsLens (optics)MedicineRadiation protectionLead apronInterventional radiology

摘要: A thorough literature review about the current situation on implementation of eye lens monitoring has been performed in order to provide recommendations regarding dosemeter types, calibration procedures and practical aspects for interventional radiology personnel. Most relevant data from 100 papers have analysed classified following topics: challenges today monitoring; conversion coefficients, phantoms dose evaluation; correction factors dosemeters measurements; position influence protective devices. The major findings can be summarised as follows: recommended operational quantity is H p (3). At present, several are available being developed. However, practice, very often, alternative methods used assess lens. summary found assessment provided. These give an estimation when methods, such use a whole body dosemeter, used. wide range values found, thus indicating large uncertainty associated with these simplified methods. Reduction most common devices obtained experimentally using Monte Carlo calculations presented. paper concludes that placed at collar level outside lead apron useful first estimate exposure. workplaces estimated annual equivalent close limit, specific should performed. Finally, training involved medical staff risks ionising radiation correct systems strongly recommended.

参考文章(90)
N. Petoussi-Henss, W.E. Bolch, K.F. Eckerman, A. Endo, N. Hertel, J. Hunt, M. Pelliccioni, H. Schlattl, M. Zankl, Conversion Coefficients for Radiological Protection Quantities for External Radiation Exposures Annals of The Icrp. ,vol. 40, pp. 1- 257 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.ICRP.2011.10.001
A.K. Junk, B.V. Worgul, Z. Haskal, Cataract in Interventional Radiology – an Occupational Hazard? Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ,vol. 45, pp. 388- 388 ,(2004)
R.J.J.N. Janssen, R.H. Hadders, M.S. Henkelman, A.J.J. Bos, Exposure to Operating Staff During Cardiac Catheterisation Measured by Thermoluminescence Dosimetry Radiation Protection Dosimetry. ,vol. 43, pp. 175- 177 ,(1992) , 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.RPD.A081359
R Behrens, On the operational quantity H(p)(3) for eye lens dosimetry. Journal of Radiological Protection. ,vol. 32, pp. 455- 464 ,(2012) , 10.1088/0952-4746/32/4/455
R. Behrens, J. Engelhardt, M. Figel, O. Hupe, M. Jordan, R. Seifert, Hp(0.07) photon dosemeters for eye lens dosimetry: calibration on a rod vs. a slab phantom. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. ,vol. 148, pp. 139- 142 ,(2012) , 10.1093/RPD/NCR028
Eleftheria Carinou, Merce Ginjaume, Una O’Connor, Renata Kopec, Marta Sans Merce, Status of eye lens radiation dose monitoring in European hospitals. Journal of Radiological Protection. ,vol. 34, pp. 729- 739 ,(2014) , 10.1088/0952-4746/34/4/729
Paul F. Heini, Roberto L. Mini, Rene Orler, Roger Harstall, Radiation exposure to the surgeon during fluoroscopically assisted percutaneous vertebroplasty: a prospective study. Spine. ,vol. 30, pp. 1893- 1898 ,(2005) , 10.1097/01.BRS.0000174121.48306.16
C. Koukorava, E. Carinou, P. Ferrari, S. Krim, L. Struelens, Study of the parameters affecting operator doses in interventional radiology using Monte Carlo simulations Radiation Measurements. ,vol. 46, pp. 1216- 1222 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.RADMEAS.2011.06.057
Simon Bouffler, Elizabeth Ainsbury, Phil Gilvin, John Harrison, Radiation-induced cataracts: the Health Protection Agency’s response to the ICRP statement on tissue reactions and recommendation on the dose limit for the eye lens Journal of Radiological Protection. ,vol. 32, pp. 479- 488 ,(2012) , 10.1088/0952-4746/32/4/479