Tolerant Attitudes Reflect an Intent to Steward: A Reply to Bruskotter and Fulton

作者: Adrian Treves

DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2011.621512

关键词: Wildlife conservationAction (philosophy)StewardshipWildlifeSociologyFrame (artificial intelligence)Social psychologyEnvironmental ethicsContinuum (measurement)

摘要: The terms tolerance and intolerance are widely used by scholars managers alike because they understood in contexts beyond attitudes or behavior toward wildlife. Tolerance is a frame of mind; thus, should also be considered one. Redefining as the opposite stewardship would conflate intention behavior; I argue that tolerance–neutrality–intolerance continuum attitudes, whereas stewardship–inaction–opposition action. In my framework, willingness to steward wolves retaliate against them represent intentions support oppose wolf conservation.

参考文章(3)
Jeremy T. Bruskotter, David C. Fulton, Will hunters steward wolves? A comment on Treves and Martin Society & Natural Resources. ,vol. 25, pp. 97- 102 ,(2012) , 10.1080/08941920.2011.622735
Icek Ajzen, The theory of planned behavior Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. ,vol. 50, pp. 179- 211 ,(1991) , 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Adrian Treves, Hunting for large carnivore conservation Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 46, pp. 1350- 1356 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2009.01729.X