作者: Adrian Treves
DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2011.621512
关键词: Wildlife conservation 、 Action (philosophy) 、 Stewardship 、 Wildlife 、 Sociology 、 Frame (artificial intelligence) 、 Social psychology 、 Environmental ethics 、 Continuum (measurement)
摘要: The terms tolerance and intolerance are widely used by scholars managers alike because they understood in contexts beyond attitudes or behavior toward wildlife. Tolerance is a frame of mind; thus, should also be considered one. Redefining as the opposite stewardship would conflate intention behavior; I argue that tolerance–neutrality–intolerance continuum attitudes, whereas stewardship–inaction–opposition action. In my framework, willingness to steward wolves retaliate against them represent intentions support oppose wolf conservation.