Transtibial prosthetic socket pistoning: static evaluation of Seal-In(®) X5 and Dermo(®) Liner using motion analysis system.
作者： H. Gholizadeh , N.A. Abu Osman , M. Kamyab , A. Eshraghi , W.A.B. Wan Abas
DOI: 10.1016/J.CLINBIOMECH.2011.07.004
关键词: Prosthetic socket 、 Prosthesis 、 Biomedical engineering 、 Vertical displacement 、 Engineering 、 Seal (mechanical) 、 Motion analysis 、 Weight-bearing 、 Bearing (mechanical) 、 Residual limb
摘要: Abstract Background The method of attachment prosthesis to the residual limb (suspension) and socket fitting is a critical issue in process providing an amputee with prosthesis. Different suspension methods try minimize pistoning movement inside socket. Seal-In® X5 Dermo® Liner by Ossur are new liners that intend reduce between liner. Since effects these on unclear, objective this study was compare effect using Vicon Motion System. Methods Six transtibial amputees, both Iceross Liner, participated study. vertical displacement (pistoning) measured liner single support prosthetic (full-weight bearing), double (semi-weight non-weight bearing limb, also under three static loading conditions (30 N, 60 N, 90 N). Findings results demonstrated within when used, decreased 71% comparison Liner. In addition, significant difference two different found (p Interpretation Participants needed put extra effort for donning doffing X5; however, type provided less pistoning. approach uses motion analysis system might be alternative measuring
elsevier.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(37)
Sangeorzan B, Boone Da, del Aguila M, Reiber G, Legro Mw, Ajax Mj, Smith Dg, Larsen Ja, Issues of importance reported by persons with lower limb amputations and prostheses. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. ,vol. 36, pp. 155- 163 ,(1999)
Simon P. R Jenkins, Sports Science Handbook ,(1996)
Richard L. Newton, Dan Morgan, Melvyn H. Schreiber, Radiological evaluation of prosthetic fit in below-the-knee amputees. Skeletal Radiology. ,vol. 17, pp. 276- 280 ,(1988) , 10.1007/BF00401811
Jason E. Tanner, Gary M. Berke, Radiographic Comparison of Vertical Tibial Translation Using Two Types of Suspensions on a Transtibial Prosthesis: A Case Study Jpo Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics. ,vol. 13, pp. 14- 16 ,(2001) , 10.1097/00008526-200103000-00012
Carlton E. Fillauer, Charles H. Pritham, Karl D. Fillauer, Evolution and Development of the Silicone Suction Socket (3S) for Below-Knee Prostheses Jpo Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics. ,vol. 1, pp. 92- 103 ,(1989) , 10.1097/00008526-198901000-00007
G. Selvik, Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Acta Radiologica. ,vol. 31, pp. 113- 126 ,(1990) , 10.1177/028418519003100201
N.A. Abu Osman, W.D. Spence, S.E. Solomonidis, J.P. Paul, A.M. Weir, The patellar tendon bar! Is it a necessary feature? Medical Engineering & Physics. ,vol. 32, pp. 760- 765 ,(2010) , 10.1016/J.MEDENGPHY.2010.04.020
Roy W. Wirta, Frank L. Golbranson, Randy Mason, Kevin Calvo, Analysis of below-knee suspension systems: Effect on gait The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. ,vol. 27, pp. 385- 396 ,(1990) , 10.1682/JRRD.1990.10.0385
Christiane Gauthier-Gagnon, Marie-Claude Grisé, Diane Potvin, Enabling factors related to prosthetic use by people with transtibial and transfemoral amputation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. ,vol. 80, pp. 706- 713 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90177-6
Uno Erikson, Rudolf Lemperg, Roentgenological Study of Movements of the Amputation Stump Within the Prosthesis Socket in Below-Knee Amputees Fitted with a Ptb Prosthesis Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. ,vol. 40, pp. 520- 526 ,(1969) , 10.3109/17453676909046537