Comparison of sevoflurane with isoflurane for rapid mask induction in midazolam and butorphanol-sedated dogs.

作者: T. Mutoh , K. Kojima , K. Takao , R. Nishimura , N. Sasaki

DOI: 10.1046/J.1439-0442.2001.00350.X

关键词: AnesthesiaRespiratory acidosisHeart rateSevofluraneMidazolamChemistryRespiratory rateMinimum alveolar concentrationButorphanolIsoflurane

摘要: Rapid mask induction can be a useful technique for veterinary patients, although it is often accompanied by exaggerated excitement responses in unpremedicated animals (Mutoh et al.: Jpn. J. Vet. Anesth. Surg. 26, 109–116; Med. Sci. 57, 1007–1013; 1121–1124; 1995). The aim of this study was to compare sevoflurane with isoflurane rapid six dogs sedated combination midazolam (0.1 mg/kg) and butorphanol (0.2 mg/kg). Induction (5 %, 2.4 minimum alveolar concentration [MAC]) O2 resulted shorter time loss the palpebral reflex, negative tail clamp response, successful intubation than (3 %, MAC) O2. There were no changes heart rate or mean arterial blood pressure during sevoflurane, whereas an increase observed induced isoflurane. A decrease respiratory compared pre-induction induction, associated mild acidosis, characterized PCO2, measured at end period both groups. None had episodes induction-related complications. These results suggest that produce smooth onset butorphanol-sedated dogs. Sevoflurane more suitable since provides faster lower blood/gas partition coefficient.

参考文章(22)
Tatsushi MUTOH, Ryohei NISHIMURA, Hwi-yool KIM, Satoru MATSUNAGA, Tsuyoshi KADOSAWA, Manabu MOCHIZUKI, Nobuo SASAKI, Clinical Application of Rapid Inhalation Induction of Anesthesia Using Isoflurane and Sevoflurane with Nitrous Oxide in Dogs Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. ,vol. 57, pp. 1121- 1124 ,(1995) , 10.1292/JVMS.57.1121
Tatsushi MUTOH, Ryohei NISHIMURA, Hwi-yool KIM, Satoru MATSUNAGA, Tsuyoshi KADOSAWA, Manabu MOCHIZUKI, Nobuo SASAKI, 犬におけるイソフルラン, セボフルラン, 笑気による高濃度急速マスク導入法の応用 Japanese Journal of Veterinary Anesthesia & Surgery. ,vol. 26, pp. 109- 116 ,(1995) , 10.2327/JVAS.26.109
R A Johnson, D C Sawyer, E Striler, D B Brunson, Comparison of isoflurane with sevoflurane for anesthesia induction and recovery in adult dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research. ,vol. 59, pp. 478- 481 ,(1998)
Mutoh T, Nishimura R, Sasaki N, Matsunaga S, Kim Hy, Kim Hy, Cardiopulmonary effects of sevoflurane, compared with halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane, in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research. ,vol. 58, pp. 885- 890 ,(1997)
K. Kojima, R. Nishimura, T. Mutoh, K. Takao, S. Matsunaga, M. Mochizuki, N. Sasaki, Comparison of sedative effects of medetomidine-midazolam, acepromazine-butorphanol and midazolam-butorphanol in dogs. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series A-physiology Pathology Clinical Medicine. ,vol. 46, pp. 141- 148 ,(1999) , 10.1046/J.1439-0442.1999.00194.X
Ralph C. Harvey, Precautions When Using Mask Induction Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice. ,vol. 22, pp. 310- 311 ,(1992) , 10.1016/S0195-5616(92)50616-7
Tatsushi Mutoh, Hirokazu Tsubone, Ryohei Nishimura, Nobuo Sasaki, Responses of laryngeal capsaicin-sensitive receptors to volatile anesthetics in anesthetized dogs. Respiration Physiology. ,vol. 111, pp. 113- 125 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0034-5687(97)00123-0
G.B. Drummond, UPPER AIRWAY REFLEXES BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia. ,vol. 70, pp. 121- 123 ,(1993) , 10.1093/BJA/70.2.121
Robert R. Paddleford, Advantages and Guidelines for Mask Induction Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice. ,vol. 22, pp. 308- 309 ,(1992) , 10.1016/S0195-5616(92)50615-5