Waiting for waste: Nuclear imagination and the politics of distant futures in Finland

作者: Timothy J. Foley

DOI: 10.1016/J.ERSS.2020.101867

关键词: DeferenceFutures contractNuclear powerSustainabilityFlexibility (engineering)Political economyTechnological changeThe ImaginaryPoliticsPolitical science

摘要: Abstract Nuclear energy production leaves behind waste that endangers human health for over 100,000 years. Governments and nuclear power producers around the world are scrambling to safely sustainably dispose of these byproducts. To manage waste, Finland began constructing Onkalo spent fuel repository, which is first structure in engineered last one hundred millennia. The purpose this article examine competing imaginaries deep-time policymaking process. This paper analyzes history repository decision-making process authorizing its creation, arguing deep time policy decisions mediated by expected technological progress future generations. I present two different imaginaries: progressive precautionary. imaginary believes technology generations will outpace natural challenges, so contemporary decisionmakers should prioritize flexibility. In contrast, precautionary skeptical consistently advance favors immediate action mitigate long-term risks. suggest Onkalo’s development adoption rested upon a prevailing imagination, explained part Finnish society’s general deference established expertise. argue progressive-precautionary framework can help explain both cross-national variations single case studies decisions. conclude considering generalizability my analysis areas research.

参考文章(54)
Richard Irvine, Deep time: an anthropological problem Social Anthropology. ,vol. 22, pp. 157- 172 ,(2014) , 10.1111/1469-8676.12067
Allison M. Macfarlane, Rodney C. Ewing, Uncertainty underground : Yucca Mountain and the nation's high-level nuclear waste MIT Press. ,(2006)
Daniel A. Farber, Paul A. Hemmersbaugh, The Shadow of the Future: Discount Rates, Later Generations, and the Environment Vanderbilt Law Review. ,vol. 46, pp. 267- ,(1993)
Howard Kunreuther, Douglas Easterling, The Dilemma of Siting a High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository ,(2011)
Lennart Sjoberg*, Local Acceptance of a High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository Risk Analysis. ,vol. 24, pp. 737- 749 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.0272-4332.2004.00472.X
S. Chu, Carbon capture and sequestration. Science. ,vol. 325, pp. 1599- 1599 ,(2009) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1181637
Edith Brown Weiss, Our Rights and Obligations to Future Generations for the Environment American Journal of International Law. ,vol. 84, pp. 198- 207 ,(1990) , 10.2307/2203020