作者: Bart Vanhercke
DOI: 10.1695/2009016
关键词: National Pension 、 Open method of coordination 、 European social model 、 Soft law 、 Political science 、 Social policy 、 Pension 、 Social protection 、 Law and economics 、 Legislation
摘要: Tackling pensions' problems means engaging with what Pierson (2001) has called 'immovable objects'. Additionally, the EU competence for drafting specific legislation in this area remains unfulfilled potential, while other policy areas creates indirect pressures on national pension policies. Under such circumstances it seems that room an effective European intervention domain is limited, especially "soft" modes of governance as Open Method Coordination Social Protection and Inclusion (SPSI). The pension's strand SPSI OMC often referred to academic writings a bureaucratic nightmare which only involves experts technocrats, even if some cognitive effects have been acknowledged. I take issue against view mere window dressing. This chapter argues "effective" provides opportunities create windows opportunity policymakers use their efforts discuss, manage reform systems. Building John Kingdon's (1995) theoretical framework applying both level (most likely) case Belgium, conclude influences, odds, three core streams formation process. First, influences acceptance compelling so decision makers pay serious attention them; secondly, brings about changes political stream; thirdly makes certain ideas 'take hold grow', they matter (more) soup. mechanisms through operates are puzzling, deliberate learning de facto socialization, powering, usage architecture peer pressure result comparisons others.