Extracorporeal bubbles: a word of caution.

作者: Filip M.J.J. De Somer , Maria R. Vetrano , Jeroen P.A.J. Van Beeck , Guido J. Van Nooten

DOI: 10.1510/ICVTS.2009.229088

关键词: UltrasonographyPore sizeExtracorporealCardiopulmonary bypassCuvetteMicrobubblesSurgeryNuclear medicineCardiac Surgery proceduresMedicineAverage diameter

摘要: Objectives Gaseous microemboli (GME) are a cause of neurocognitive deficit postcardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. However, the measurement microbubbles during bypass is not easy, because blood an opaque fluid and contains microparticles. Recently, two new microbubble counters, Gampt BC200 emboli detection classification (EDAC) quantifier, were developed for use cardiac surgery. The accuracy both devices was validated against industrial standards. Methods A clear analogue (30%/70% glycerol-water) pumped, by means rollerpump out partially filled arterial line screen filter nominal pore size 20 microm. Downstream pump, all test sensors optical cuvette, inserted in vertically mounted 3/8 inch tubing. Measurements taken at flows 405, 1080, 3000 6000 ml/min. Backlight shadowgraphy counting used as reference techniques measuring counts. Results On average EDAC quantifier underestimates bubble diameter 35+/-1%, 13+/-8%, 71+/-7% 33+/-4% ml/min, respectively. has good sizing agreement 1080 ml/min (+5+/-17%) (+33+/-6%) but overestimates 220+/-40% 295+/-49% 405 Both only count number higher flows. At 3 l/min counts 38%, 18% total 6 3% Conclusions can be clinical setting monitoring basal GME production. have some major limitations when studying 'worst case' scenarios. One should take great caution correlating measured data outcome. Finally, results obtained one device first study cannot compared nor exchanged from other second study.

参考文章(20)
Hindman Bj, Dexter F, Computer simulation of microscopic cerebral air emboli absorption during cardiac surgery. Undersea & hyperbaric medicine : journal of the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society. ,vol. 25, pp. 43- 50 ,(1998)
Jeffrey B. Riley, Arterial line filters ranked for gaseous micro-emboli separation performance: an in vitro study. The journal of extra-corporeal technology. ,vol. 40, pp. 21- 26 ,(2008)
J. Ahonen, M. Salmenperä, Brain injury after adult cardiac surgery. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. ,vol. 48, pp. 4- 19 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1399-6576.2004.00275.X
B. D. Butler, B. A. Hills, The lung as a filter for microbubbles Journal of Applied Physiology. ,vol. 47, pp. 537- 543 ,(1979) , 10.1152/JAPPL.1979.47.3.537
JE Lynch, JB Riley, Microemboli detection on extracorporeal bypass circuitsa Perfusion. ,vol. 23, pp. 23- 32 ,(2008) , 10.1177/0267659108094350
C.-M. Muth, E. S. Shank, Cerebral arterial gas embolism: should we hyperventilate these patients? Intensive Care Medicine. ,vol. 30, pp. 742- 743 ,(2004) , 10.1007/S00134-004-2209-5
Michal Barak, Yeshayahu Katz, Microbubbles : Pathophysiology and clinical implications Chest. ,vol. 128, pp. 2918- 2932 ,(2005) , 10.1378/CHEST.128.4.2918
Stephan Eitschberger, Andreas Henseler, Benedikt Krasenbrink, Bernd Oedekoven, Khosrow Mottaghy, Investigation on the ability of an ultrasound bubble detector to deliver size measurements of gaseous bubbles in fluid lines by using a glass bead model. Asaio Journal. ,vol. 47, pp. 18- 24 ,(2001) , 10.1097/00002480-200101000-00006
Simon Urbanek, Hans-Jürgen Tiedtke, Improved methods for measurement of gaseous microbubbles during extracorporeal circulation Perfusion. ,vol. 17, pp. 429- 434 ,(2002) , 10.1191/0267659102PF611OA